all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tamas K Papp <tkpapp@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?
Date: 4 Jan 2011 12:41:43 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ogis7Fi4mU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ifv3co$q39$1@speranza.aioe.org

On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0000, Tim Harig wrote:

> On 2011-01-04, Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> wrote:
>> On 2011-01-04 08:02:35 +0000, Tim Harig said:
>>
>>> 	LISP users on the other hand, never seem to be able to let go of LISP
>>> 	when the situation requires it.
>>
>> I think this probably is not the case.  It may be the case that the
>> Lisp users *you hear from* often have this view, but I don't think
>> those people are necessarily very representative of Lisp users as a
>> whole.  Of course I can't really infer much about the ones you don't
>> hear from other than in a sort of dark-energy way - implementors are
>> probably the only people who might have a chance of knowing about them
>> in any reliable way.
> 
> The loudest voices in the crowd tend to characterize the crowd.
> Unfortunately, to my point, those vocal zealots in the LISP community
> are not doing it any favors.
> 
> Perhaps I am alone in this, but I don't much appreciate being part of
> communities that are too openly negative towards others.  It really puts
> a poor taste in my mouth.  I am a right tool for the right job kind of
> person and I prefer communities that are open enough to be able to
> properly evaluate the role of their chosen tools compared to others.

It would be great if you could substantiate your points with examples
(eg links to discussions on newsgroups or mailing lists).  I have been
following c.l.l for years now, but I haven't seen the kind of zealotry
that you describe.  Perhaps this is because Lisp zealots go to other
forums: this is of course possible, but I would be interested in
seeing examples of lispers being "openly negative towards others"
before entertaining the idea that this is some sort of general
tendency.

I don't believe that it is possible to have a meaningful discussion
about this question unless you are a lot more specific about your
claims.

Best,

Tamas


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-04 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-01  7:04 How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? girosenth
2011-01-01 11:39 ` Elena
2011-01-01 14:15 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-01 16:08   ` Nathan
2011-01-01 18:05     ` Jan Burse
2011-01-01 23:56     ` The Quiet Center
2011-01-02  1:10       ` Jan Burse
2011-01-02  3:45       ` LanX
2011-01-02  4:04         ` LanX
2011-01-02  5:36           ` Nathan
2011-01-02  6:46             ` Paul Rubin
2011-01-02 15:01               ` LanX
2011-01-02 15:14                 ` Jerome Baum
2011-01-02 21:21                 ` Paul Rubin
2011-01-02  7:14             ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-02  6:59       ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-03 15:22         ` LanX
2011-01-02 14:07       ` Frank GOENNINGER
2011-01-07  9:41       ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-09 10:41         ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevelfunctional " WJ
2011-01-03 10:29     ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional " Didier Verna
2011-01-03 13:05       ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04  4:49         ` rusi
2011-01-04  5:39           ` D Herring
2011-01-04  8:02             ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04  9:09               ` Nicolas Neuss
2011-01-04 10:00               ` Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04 12:21                 ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 12:23                   ` Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04 13:33                     ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 12:41                   ` Tamas K Papp [this message]
2011-01-04 23:32                 ` Tim X
2011-01-05  1:35                   ` [OT] LISP community advocacy [was Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?] Tim Harig
2011-01-05  9:52                   ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04  6:24           ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-04 15:43             ` Raffael Cavallaro
2011-01-04 10:18         ` Didier Verna
2011-01-01 22:50   ` girosenth
2011-01-02 21:11     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-01-03 16:21     ` José A. Romero L.
2011-01-03 18:03     ` jacko
2011-01-02 23:45   ` Chip Eastham
2011-01-01 18:27 ` How to improve the readability of Steve Revilak
2011-01-01 19:22 ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? prad
2011-01-01 23:56 ` Pascal Costanza
2011-01-02  5:39   ` D Herring
2011-01-02 14:17     ` Frank GOENNINGER
2011-01-02 14:53       ` Jerome Baum
2011-01-02 14:58         ` LanX
2011-01-02 17:55     ` Bernd Paysan
2011-01-03 18:07   ` jacko
2011-01-02 12:59 ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-02 19:14   ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-03  5:20     ` Elizabeth D Rather
2011-01-03 10:48     ` MarkWills
2011-01-03 15:13       ` LanX
2011-01-03 18:20     ` jacko
2011-01-03 18:22     ` jacko
2011-01-03 10:18 ` Didier Verna
2011-01-04  6:47 ` pineapple
2011-01-04 14:14   ` P.M.Lawrence
2011-01-05 14:58 ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 16:21   ` Andrew Haley
2011-01-05 21:29     ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-06  8:57       ` Jonathan Groll
2011-01-07  5:36     ` Xah Lee
2011-01-07 13:28       ` Andrew Haley
2011-01-07 16:19         ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 17:59   ` Elena
2011-01-05 20:13     ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 21:42     ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-06 13:38       ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-06 19:20         ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-07  0:09           ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-07 12:04           ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-06 22:59   ` Xah Lee
2011-01-07 11:47     ` Jan Burse
2011-01-21 10:03       ` rupertlssmith
2011-01-21 16:08         ` Jan Burse
2011-01-21 21:43           ` D. J. Penton
2011-01-18 22:55 ` m_l_g3
2011-01-19 13:45   ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-21 16:15   ` Jan Burse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-02 16:50 Drew Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ogis7Fi4mU1@mid.individual.net \
    --to=tkpapp@gmail.com \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.