From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17846: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:20:59 -0400 Message-ID: <8k4mz8ssmc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403724135 30774 80.91.229.3 (25 Jun 2014 19:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17846@debbugs.gnu.org To: Davor Rotim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 25 21:22:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzslj-0000ki-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:22:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzsli-000185-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzslf-00017y-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzsle-0006rY-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzsle-0006rL-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzsle-0000HJ-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17846 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17846-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17846.1403724070954 (code B ref 17846); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17846) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2014 19:21:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzskj-0000FC-Le for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33897 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzske-0000ER-PC for 17846@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wzskd-0005Sf-Py; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:20:59 -0400 X-Spook: Rubin JFK AK-47 Dick Cheney JSOFC3IP Islam Abduganievich X-Ran: N%:(P"Dg+Qs2.LO0I8j=HYDmC{I;u2ADVN{\*0W{=3(>6DqAEjYe]1r0'vo-d\:!l"3,]% X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Davor Rotim's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:46:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90806 Archived-At: Davor Rotim wrote: > emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1701883 bytes needed) That ties in with what I saw on 32-bit RHEL 6 (I don't normally use 32-bit any more), so I bumped BASE_PURESIZE to 1702000. I'm worried that this was only now reported... See also http://debbugs.gnu.org/17255 Perhaps a larger increment should be added, for safety?