From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The netsec thread Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:25 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <8f52a86a-bc74-47d8-f792-83ce870666fa@cs.ucla.edu> References: <834l36koak.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnlg7r83.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87o90gd1us.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <9308f549-adf8-e5c1-1bcd-beea2ddb0e0f@cs.ucla.edu> <87r25cb6vy.fsf@gnus.org> <791d5bcb-3684-c791-48f5-c1af765a5c9d@cs.ucla.edu> <87mufxajwq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="158268"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 03 15:34:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i58wv-000f1K-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:34:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46138 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i58wt-00081C-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i58tD-0005J5-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:30:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i58tB-0003EJ-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:39576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i58tB-0003CH-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:30:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63B21600CE; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ot_o5qTLi1It; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037651600EC; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id D4EH-tvAPRap; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 961791600CE; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:30:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239810 Archived-At: Robert Pluim wrote: > In a similar vein: TLS1.3 removed support for renegotiation, so should > the following in gnutls-peer-status be made conditional on TLS1.3 > having not been negotiated? > > /* Renegotiation Indication */ > result = nconc2 > (result, list2 (intern (":safe-renegotiation"), > gnutls_safe_renegotiation_status (state) ? Qt : Qnil)); If the Lisp code doesn't care or need it and if it's easy to suppress, it'd make sense to do that, yes. I don't have an opinion since I don't know GnuTLS that well.