From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Missing snprintf in ucrt mingw + vc-refresh in find-file hook? Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: <8cb8fc4f-970c-4505-8b36-7b2dbaaa6b85@libero.it> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40069"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 13 23:22:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ra1Aj-000ACB-Rq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:22:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ra19o-00045K-9b; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ra19m-00044y-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-34.italiaonline.it ([213.209.10.34] helo=libero.it) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ra19j-00019w-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.229] ([79.52.199.73]) by smtp-34.iol.local with ESMTPA id a19gr1n8fRMD4a19grv0Tx; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:21:32 +0100 x-libjamoibt: 1601 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=libero.it; s=s2021; t=1707862892; bh=G7zFb7Fd2vwDh/sF8+mezpvdBuzYZAS7DBIwQI4J9FE=; h=From; b=EuKDzcK0iKK8O9jcHj6rm+PK1rIgXsaVtNlSfywFNmd1VlaSArRPeUD8H8VkAXeJj ikHjd8jADyxugw4fUPDz+JV2SQZSxsiKxlqGXOht+rQWfAnPaJIh34nhohu8cgLf0e dZ+DrahqARl1XsLQ2WGdLyiXEn9DeZZfRwQJMS+8y+SzTqSCzlSj9laRG1bK7i3htF XlzFTNZv0M55ricTpXW5ZeYsDOV7KO+BaGi/pLJbpuWocstEBYTKfVR8AC1Se1pDvq DuTvaS6nHssQICixg9q9MgEs4wnOpqmeARdHrDECAKjxqDkBcAtvjBnOT5PENCQhbi FLMiZajIsSKZg== X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=P+CZhTAu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65cbeb6c cx=a_exe a=3TuAVBrBagIVlP9Vx+VTZA==:117 a=3TuAVBrBagIVlP9Vx+VTZA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wl2CUO3F2XfhwOxvYqQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Content-Language: en-GB, en-US, it In-Reply-To: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfAYVRXyfBrv6wfFIysw0qhBiZyGMw1AkcmoyzknbQIZt4WPg7Y4zY9czdhTAYbiTXgdtAAq7UOJHJxD2A3uF1s/Gx4hs3m/dBFLyPTpZJfysFj3RCde3 dtG8m9W4EpP1VWj5yEiDnJZBvg1peIUwP4JS02lfNow9MnmCfZBwLGJKjLhZsxcTt4DQJJT7xCBN4lMF3WZI306QaJ9vAQRGEIbAccoHhQukpQ/FB27zLI5p WL97bDnyvIQ+Ff/802/Qyw== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.209.10.34; envelope-from=angelo.g0@libero.it; helo=libero.it X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316190 Archived-At: Il 13/02/2024 23:09, Arthur Miller ha scritto: > > I was lazy; I just tried git apply ucrt.patch, and it refused; nad I was like 3 > if-defs; I can just put it in, 30 seconds :). I just build with gcc, so I wasn't > interestedin clang patch. I don't remember well now.. but without the clang patch the build finishes with a "...not functional Emacs" message.. maybe the clang patch is not only for CLANG... MSYS2 people should explain this.. > > By the way, is there any reason to build with clang instead of gcc? Faster, > smaller, better? I never tried to be honest. they build for different "architecture/systems": ucrt64, clang64, mingw64, clangarm64.. They are starting to drop some 32-bit packages. Ask them for other details... Ciao, Angelo.