From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preview: portable dumper Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:26:44 -0800 Message-ID: <8c9c9295-20d7-41b7-724c-5e98a5572273@dancol.org> References: <87r2pfsjm7.fsf@gmail.com> <21ee28b4-c3cd-4664-a501-8df6b78d3e48@email.android.com> <87zi43h8i6.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaerh7wy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519151315 11801 195.159.176.226 (20 Feb 2018 18:28:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:28:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 20 19:28:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCeT-0002pU-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:28:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCgW-0005wZ-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCcu-0003gA-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:26:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCct-0008Lm-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:26:52 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:34890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCct-0008L7-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:26:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=3i9jy58aNX0Wi1mBECS7ioFQ9Lo5d/2IVKxt2pppDKM=; b=CR6Y59pC5Y8UcgJHgLIXI+ky1pDb8JoNYolaDpfBvdC0POp/ZOqt/ptkmFwaC++Nfuxbh7UdRryGxNh18cAl03g3EqdXnXNYuzp065VgjCCZ5c26sr1UaU+N9pyzz/+awWHZTniVSHM7WeReVgYY27MAVxrZ/VmxwTmn08oGSZqJ6bqGr78V4YLP6EAmWjVseX7yVaXZapXtfaj/9CfdIVUpNGu9/iBAiRJF2zO1HkmWLGdQTUnsDDWEYQS+XyDKiK8GKFMaCPgiO32dxHQoOkiuT/icjZM2OFwUTPQfjpT+gMt1CcvdUiBU82rJulsgZ/W2VHfHScbvhvNz/aFQpg==; Original-Received: from [2604:4080:1321:8ab0:e568:87d3:fce4:c549] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCcs-0007SB-9y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:26:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87vaerh7wy.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222940 Archived-At: On 02/20/2018 09:45 AM, Robert Pluim wrote: > Robert Pluim writes: > >>> Do you get an assertion failure if you enable assertion checking? If we're seeing this kind of problem from the compiler expectation alone, I'll definitely revert that change. >> >> No, --enable-checking=all gets me a different segfault: > > And in fact I get that segfault even with > fca8372020248318f1d0007378607a912b19026e reverted, but only with > --enable-checking=all Thanks. Can repro locally now.