From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32012: 27.0.50; jit-lock--run-functions broken Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: <8be5975a-6b51-4a74-745c-7b601bd3ce43@online.de> References: <4bf10ce1-6b8a-3197-c0eb-4c9323d714fa@online.de> <8336x4ok8x.fsf@gnu.org> <86f0f3da-d3aa-4a58-9779-73a59060bbcf@online.de> <83in60mths.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530357366 26005 195.159.176.226 (30 Jun 2018 11:16:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:16:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 Cc: 32012@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 30 13:16:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDrF-0006hB-VJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:16:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDtM-0001sF-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDtG-0001s7-KD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDtC-00071o-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDtC-00071O-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDtC-0003It-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32012.153035743812645 (code B ref 32012); Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2018 11:17:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDsU-0003Hs-Ep for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:43997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZDsS-0003Hf-R9 for 32012@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([88.75.179.170]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue103 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKcX1-1fXICQ3jUd-001xdb; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:17:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83in60mths.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KBuwL8Ae3VcJEJKmodsRxSK0PYAHhgbXY8Gi7Jy4FrYsLGOZAm1 an5YHU+Vl9SQKH3AjWK/SXVSgjXeWAy5SDvuPp8OZt3rShigrhGgznyewzZQZ14ygCad8rl NvJAr8almqIoi7QVdVdClUf1g7W7jGbeGJNN79tjmrPWXpjt/4i8T0LlxniR9CFC8d7SP9e MqYU66YrbddAMjgiXkpag== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ZXCphBAeDKM=:6Y1YJ2V6cx70MoBN5z8Kug IUd0tXDfkXG4nSF5F6+8wLsFJiBZ1uW6oil+ZMWX2WyK4Ik9zhVlCynwfuG4a/mxRIAOOuDDd OkZDE4+hjOyZRlhDYJcNYqsr0bpLiuh6fM6zcLGKmtigPKxUgHpV1A06KCAtvPlIdcZtIjvqB 9/09H+GsCRIzNXdSMb1GvQaoWDZ3L9OcSSXcAdk0dZ6cNN0X956vQY9GxW+Vblobeznxk629E PXfJfHKgTF5Pd+EvV46n13M9UQONp29G7+zwkiXa9XIh75Reke9+KXKYxM2h5DNR/l/Z69j3F m9mN982mwrkiuznq706CSlRvpDEXf8gyBV193AIGvzxpQ7l6OhApNmVnQ+dRxwqFF7Slv+b9F gY+MHuCQ6/SvAR2viFcT+i04bZ3I71VLxHoY3G+X12ruXU2UOw4tB2zjXR57yT2SZZFyIY4a4 pugmE6CGGLOC974+zw26dlM64WcIVgCZK9LsR0unrC16WaSWIxarV32/xanm8eXJnQoUYqk7A ltIQC+W/jjr7g4JR0UMnjGaX/CJ4zjxAHGQwgDpKqA2qQVk/ShTHhuB9YRBlSOh9YNHHKTofj T7eweizB6z6852EEz4ktRtQmV6CVrjJC2EJPi0HnEUJOZ15PPdLnYZ4M0fU9rVOdMlvh8kKaE Yx8rC6drrxxpoboaRmq8Tx3SwCBCqNjxsN4iFhHfYZQiVL4dD2+/s7nmgMr00px31KPveyz6b kMtCSALyPO353LY8 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148007 Archived-At: On 30.06.2018 12:57, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 32012@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Andreas Röhler >> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:54:49 +0200 >> >> On 30.06.2018 08:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> From: Andreas Röhler >>>> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:16:55 +0200 >>>> >>>> Running into it from ert-tests which call ‘jit-lock-fontify-now’ >>>> >>>> When reproduced from emacs -Q in scratch-buffer: >>>> >>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (2 . 2) 0) >>>> jit-lock--run-functions() >>>> eval((jit-lock--run-functions) nil) >>>> elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil) >>>> eval-last-sexp(nil) >>>> funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil) >>>> call-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil nil) >>>> command-execute(eval-last-sexp) >>> >>> Why did you think you can call that function tis way? >>> >> >> Hmm, by looking at its signature >> >> (defun jit-lock-fontify-now (&optional start end) >> >> Why that shouldn't work? > > That's not what the backtrace suggests. It suggests that you invoked > jit-lock--run-functions via eval-last-sexp. Right. But the arguments are optional. Wherefrom to expect it failing?