From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: C-c / r key-setting bug (?) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:04:52 +0200 Message-ID: <8ED23E58-3FA8-4785-9352-4072D3F2621C@gmail.com> References: <4CC017E4.8040005@easy-emacs.de> <4CC027AD.5010902@easy-emacs.de> <4CC0354F.8020205@easy-emacs.de> <5AB3A2E2-2ECE-4789-8C20-D3D807B5F55B@gmail.com> <4CC04160.1070506@easy-emacs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53847 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8vlK-00089B-54 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:04:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vlI-0001MH-Ab for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:04:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:63684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vlI-0001M1-3B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:04:56 -0400 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so68242eyd.0 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:04:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CC04160.1070506@easy-emacs.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Cc: emacs-orgmode On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Andreas R=F6hler wrote: > Am 21.10.2010 15:00, schrieb Carsten Dominik: >> >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Andreas R=F6hler wrote: >> >>> [ ... ] >>>>>> C-c / will prompt for another key and then dispatch depending =20 >>>>>> on that >>>>>> key. >>>>>> Many do. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm, that would fit into the already mentioned coding-style =20 >>>>> category. >>>>> Is it wise to do it that way? >>>>> For example M-x describe-mode fails telling about these keys. >>>>> Are reasons for this? >>>> >>>> Yes. There are not enough keys, unless I introduce a larger number >>>> of full-scale prefix keys. And it is much easier to remember just =20= >>>> `C-c >>>> /' and then get a friendly prompt for a number of options. For >>>> interactive use, I think this is just perfect. >>>> >>>> Now, if you want to write programs based on these functions, then =20= >>>> you >>>> want to have the real command names. This is one of the reasons =20 >>>> why I >>>> like to have them in the manual, for look up. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm following, thanks for the explanation. >>> Remains a describe-mode bug than (?) >> >> I would not call it a bug. Describe-mode looks at the key maps, it >> cannot look into the functions. >> > > OK, but can't you make it known to the keymap? No, I cannot. - Carsten