From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter api Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:00:28 -0700 Message-ID: <8D3019A6-83EE-42AB-ADFA-7DA6EBB179B3@gmail.com> References: <9C5A86D6-0E7D-4DDF-B211-278EF9AC7E01@gmail.com> <87a6gq5mxl.fsf@gmail.com> <877dbu5mgj.fsf@gmail.com> <0BB906F7-BD3A-41CC-9783-19AA16934497@gmail.com> <83pmplq9f3.fsf@gnu.org> <5B304D80-2969-4F59-9A90-412D0A284912@gmail.com> <83ilvbpsvl.fsf@gnu.org> <4A6F417A-EF74-40B6-9517-6C0947AB87A6@gmail.com> <83wnjmiork.fsf@gnu.org> <6D1CD758-2C6F-4843-9739-F2A5D5591648@gmail.com> <67183EAB-5D98-4211-B71B-4618D6266A15@gmail.com> <83lews90ft.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17075"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , yoavm448@gmail.com, ubolonton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 01:01:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1na3n9-0004IW-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 01:01:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42618 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na3n8-0004Bl-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:01:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na3mM-0003P4-LT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::636] (port=33385 helo=mail-pl1-x636.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1na3mL-0000iX-3U; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id c23so977998plo.0; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tOzJZPNYqvbuUB79CqJqxtnu9znnvRDtXWWdVd2nB5o=; b=gMyWGcmZuzo+HbF1BKT/KszlH15hsj6EoEykeSbONp7ip6v0P72jjyd/47xBo6kDl9 YP08m39TJS+P/SLvgmPXmZrSMrCtUJHuVTKO3CA3/MLyQKGu9VF1l4I88eagqfPdoC9W WhhOHGkGK/Tl8M6uGw3kPfAQ/EgFMxbKW3a4PtwdEBrD/09sw9F5Z7/+ISAmDXbblaRi 2OeTSPYscWmPNPoXCm9f7uM7qRiXWqPfaEBZNxogr3FYAd94LhFApppPqtDkTVMEzke+ Jo+ZRNCjYXeAegIeCqgP/eDVKxz7mrCqkn0ztRxrpBOZJGVkKszi6omqdLQc0EpqadXp oa8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tOzJZPNYqvbuUB79CqJqxtnu9znnvRDtXWWdVd2nB5o=; b=Ei0U0Y+Z3sbuvCnPjqqrNl1Y3+imwBB58RID908dHGJsDhr1G9+oCH4TH6Lw4cnvDs 9TPV2oDopbmVaTGlUxmAgal+E75WehB0koYEdBNk3oQVokqUUJDUO/RqvC4VRb7QDyxG FrZESaWf1Uwy/233Hd/Vp/ulfXyVD+8R2D35hkeCOw2FYsaaGEeKsn+ZKMKXFFm2aM5c qKp1m5D6HPWYCDquJ+bsPScwE5CBJV9oC/EYcR5k3NqL3JUFiS8WlXNAkgN6WkZsw0od npGuEeXjNYJhrRL+ZkFNNmSDAJjT4p8s6zHCRKF9ztuE5qmh+ALCIRoX+0vSCnihIyWm Tu1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UDxp1ArZVWix0hjJ6wRttTLnWAAgQeMr1173lhh78smhaMj4g soIPu1F072ZndLOnbSOSNM/dsIFr/Nw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC4x9wbA6Y7P1NkqdJmnfj+53M+412ItS5dhlgfe7620N20O/6IvrJMjYloVS5Fyl7wdNdbg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9509:b0:1c9:de00:9ef7 with SMTP id t9-20020a17090a950900b001c9de009ef7mr8582087pjo.140.1648767630515; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple ([128.54.13.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f66-20020a62db45000000b004fa8a7b8ad3sm522883pfg.77.2022.03.31.16.00.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:00:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lews90ft.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1) X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::636 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::636; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287648 Archived-At: > > If so, I think we should have our own load-path for these > libraries; relying on the standard LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. is not good > enough (although we should support that as well). I envision that at > least in some cases users will not want to have these libraries in the > public places, or maybe even won't have the requisite access rights to > do so. We should provide Emacs-style alternatives, like some > subdirectory of ~/.emacs.d/ and/or under ${prefix}/lib/ (similar to > *.eln files). Anyone have thoughts on this? Yuan