From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34969: 26.2; `emacs -Q` unable to copy \200's eight-bit detail buffer Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:46:12 +1100 Message-ID: <8C127EF5-C029-4808-81FE-86F75DDAE190@scratch.space> References: <83pnqgnvpj.fsf@gnu.org> <83o95yn8xb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="220826"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34969@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 00:47:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZJA-000vKK-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:47:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZJ8-00008V-UF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZJ1-00008L-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZJ0-000451-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZIz-00044v-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZIz-00062X-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Van L Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34969 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34969-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34969.155355758423167 (code B ref 34969); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34969) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2019 23:46:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZIN-00061a-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:46:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:49829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8ZIL-00061R-Fc for 34969@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:46:22 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 110.174.242.246 Original-Received: from epi.local (110-174-242-246.static.tpgi.com.au [110.174.242.246]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C700C0004; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:46:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83o95yn8xb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156796 Archived-At: > On 26 Mar 2019, at 04:46, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> From: Van L >> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:14:47 +1100 >> Cc: 34969@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >>>> : 7 `emacs -Q` >>>> : [this is the first time for `emacs -Q] >>>> : [has problem the forth time run for thise version] >>>> : [on XQuartz] >>>> : [~/bin/emacs26.2r1 links to = \200nfs\200/build/emacs26.2-rc1/bin/emacs-26.2] >>>> : GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0, X toolkit) >>>> : of 2019-03-21 >>>=20 >>> Does "the forth time" mean do all the steps 4 times before the = problem >>> happens? Or does it mean repeat only some of the steps 4 times? >>=20 >> 4th time means the forth time starting from the initial condition = before Emacs is started for the same Emacs version to run in isolation = without other instances running. >=20 > So you actually started Emacs 4 times, and only on the 4th restart it > exhibited the problem? Of the 7 times listed in the bug-report, I started four times 26.2, = three of those operated the .emacs file. 1. did *not* show the problem 2. did show the problem 3. did 4. did; when called as `emacs -Q`=20 > If so, I'm quite sure this is caused by some > external software, perhaps something that takes ownership of the > clipboard contents, e.g. because it wants to let you have several > different clipboard buffers. Do you have something like that > installed and active? Provided there are no nasty contaminations from the 'net, I have the = plain old platformOS, MacPort, XQuartz installed. Copy and paste within the one Emacs is being interfered with if what you = suggest is true. >=20 >>> IOW, can you please show the transcript of repeated steps in these >>> situations? >>=20 >> That is under the section `-- A` in the bug-report.=20 >> I had hoped the trace was caught in the bug-report. >=20 > Section A just gives a single sequence, but it doesn't tell how to do > that several times, i.e. what exactly is repeated N times. a. run Emacs b. goto *scratch* buffer c. create new frame d. lookup keybindings for *scratch* buffer e. find `self` f. for the two variants of \200 copy and paste details buffer to = *scratch* Repeat the above a-f steps 7 times as listed in the bug-report for those = platforms detailed. >=20 >=20 >>> What happens if you set interprogram-cut-function and >>> interprogram-paste-function to nil? >>=20 >> Will do the next time I get a chance. >=20 > If I'm right, the problem will disappear. I am inside the one Emacs's copy and paste, and not going out of the = Emacs. >>> (And why do your symlink targets include \200 characters?) >>=20 >> I used `C-x 8 RET horizontal ellipsis` the email program was unable = to process. >> The \200 was what the email program used as substitute. >=20 > Strange email program: \200 is an unassigned codepoint. That was the emacs-bug-report mechanism in Emacs that did that.