From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Subtly hightling task backgrounds
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:07:39 -0500
Message-ID: <8C0C91A0-CBFC-439B-A05F-8F957AA1918B@gmail.com>
References: <5A411870-F03C-4DC0-A133-FE01920A4BD1@gmail.com>
	<87liwi5qlk.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44278)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1Qd7Pm-0004oQ-Gy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:07:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1Qd7Pk-00080I-Ha
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:07:46 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:49458)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1Qd7Pk-0007zk-3y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:07:44 -0400
Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so4589874iwn.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87liwi5qlk.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

On Jul 1, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Bastien wrote:

> John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> To achieve this, I have the following in my todo file:
> 
> Nice -- maybe a more general implementation would be to let
> users assign a color to a category, which is really one defcustom
> away from your code.  Would you be willing to submit a patch in
> that direction?

I would love to, but I'm just too overtaxed at work now.  I invite anyone
else to hack my patch to death, though. :)

John