From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9532: 24.0.50; `special-display-regexps' is no longer respected Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:11:31 -0700 Message-ID: <8AAF50092BB64E5F8A2E82AF50CC04DB@us.oracle.com> References: <9202F08DB196437E8AD75A3C535E5A7D@us.oracle.com><87y5xlg9xq.fsf@stupidchicken.com><1D79C6CD14EE4C76B74C446E04B9CA65@us.oracle.com><85680E6E160C472FBC47C2FDA86BA171@us.oracle.com><874o05x4l6.fsf@stupidchicken.com><208166A8F7EF4681B76EADADCA39822C@us.oracle.com> <877h51n82z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316625358 27512 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2011 17:15:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9532@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Chong Yidong'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 19:15:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOm-0000MZ-0G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:15:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56749 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOl-0006Iw-A6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOh-0006EK-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOg-0001XF-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOg-0001XB-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOv-0007Kg-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9532 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9532-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9532.131662532528142 (code B ref 9532); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9532) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2011 17:15:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOK-0007Jr-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:24 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6QOJ-0007Jk-A3 for 9532@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:15:24 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p8LHF2A7001016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:15:06 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8LHBbih004031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:11:37 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt119.oracle.com (abhmt119.oracle.com [141.146.116.71]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8LHBVZA003490; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:11:31 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:11:31 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <877h51n82z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Thread-Index: Acx4gBWSWKUa82CpT8ibu7kO9IBBwQAADqpg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4E7A1B9A.008F:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:16:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51575 Archived-At: > >> OTOH, I don't see an easy way to handle all the backward > >> compatibility ... in this case. > > > > FWIW, Martin's code worked fine in this regard. > > ... > > Perhaps look to Martin's code for an answer? Even if you decide not > > to do everything the same way he did it, perhaps for things > > like this his code can help guide you. Dunno. > > I don't know why you seem to think that there is some great mystery > here. What gives you that impression? What mystery did I speak about? What makes you think that I "seem to think" there is a mystery, great or small? I am ignorant of the various implementations - that's the only "mystery" I'm aware of: ignorance. I have been speaking only about what a user sees. If my suggestion to maybe look at how Martin kept backward compatibility is not helpful then please ignore it. All I know is the behavior I see: his code was, AFAICT, backward compatible. The current code has at least this bug, so far. > The issue is quite clear: how to handle the transition > away from same-window-regexps in commands like `info'. > The current code, AFAICT, also "works fine" if you change info back to > using pop-to-buffer + same-window-regexps. Great, then there is presumably no problem. Make it work fine. DTRT.