From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15073: 23.4; does not byte-compile several packages with `Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-type-argument sequencep 769)' (due to lexical binding?) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: <88r4dytwv8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <8738qfph4x.fsf@boo.workgroup> <20130812212224.GB8817@boo.workgroup> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376343428 15471 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2013 21:37:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC) To: 15073@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 23:37:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V8zna-0000nV-7O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59734 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8znZ-0001T4-Pw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8znT-0001Og-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8znS-0001dN-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8znS-0001dJ-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8znR-0002Vm-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15073.13763433909597 (code B ref 15073); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2013 21:36:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8zmw-0002Ui-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45616 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8zmu-0002UY-DE for 15073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8zmt-0000gB-8g; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:36:27 -0400 X-Spook: Fortezza MD4 tempest SWAT smuggle SEAL Team 6 nuclear SSL X-Ran: ,;0-*(AURS:l(Mi\PfqtrY"vn}+e)cbg9sC'fIo (Gregor Zattler's message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:22:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77300 Archived-At: Gregor Zattler wrote: > Sorry, I have no clue: Is this a bug to be fixed in emacs or are > these bugs to be fixed in those packages? What do you mean by "packages"? Do you mean some Debian packages other than apel; if so, which? Or do you just mean "there are multiple files in the apel package which all fail to compile"? The latter problem is an apel bug, which has been fixed, as I said. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718738