From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding major or popular language modes to Emacs distribution Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:45:49 +0200 Message-ID: <888125D6-C89A-41F5-8C0F-B808830F9C61@thornhill.no> References: <875yvqa3qv.fsf@ypei.me> <87czpy1nyu.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfyuozmh.fsf@gnu.org> <87o89hznqy.fsf@posteo.net> <831r6doepi.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsutzlon.fsf@posteo.net> <83wno5my3p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21336"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: hi@ypei.me To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 16:47:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJzbn-0005Kl-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 16:46:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJzbl-0006NE-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJzap-0005ZH-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:46:00 -0400 Original-Received: from out2.migadu.com ([188.165.223.204]:62883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJzan-0001wY-9C; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:45:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thornhill.no; s=key1; t=1630161952; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7GKPgDuU5PCaX6pZVUh/PwxIBozyNMvuuQP0hmF0sww=; b=tOuyMr63W0JQm1PuCOIcIFyKoUgoZauOJrm7ztAJqPC5mhLb0Ea9CQsv8JLytN4wAVhzmZ WYwRgQuygmAWPSpHOkGwlvKPTxblTL73VayEPDzk0Cjdh5jjqEirf6Vl8XmqQl8kmwoSQ1 hi99Xg+dpZwBe4P+Nlv7aqG4bNJHSkWUCROCGW+FZutNsDlRBOFCMbFZ5dedaZiPNDjt3W UKFlMpo+b0oSKr+s6GMhAYbyLE8sGq2hfaaeMOWnmjK0YMTH8S0aZCvQ1Wtf0i1TD+g9Vp kPz+z107JZwJKy73UbYLNlJF0X5z3bM8SFaTep8DmZjBAmyQ6BTJms+kcvporA== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <83wno5my3p.fsf@gnu.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: theo@thornhill.no Received-SPF: pass client-ip=188.165.223.204; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out2.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273313 Archived-At: On 28 August 2021 16:40:26 CEST, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: hi@ypei=2Eme, emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg >> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:30:16 +0000 >>=20 >> > We should definitely make the PL modes more consistent wrt the basic >> > key bindings=2E But having sch packages in ELPA doesn't help solving >> > this problem, because it's an orthogonal issue, right? >>=20 >> Yes, I was jut mentioning that if there ever were a push to include mor= e >> major modes in Emacs, that something like this might be worth >> considering=2E > >To clarify, I was only talking about programming languages that are >very popular -- I think Emacs should offer those OOTB=2E I didn't mean >we should necessarily have in core every possible language under the >sun=2E We could discuss the less popular ones on a case by case basis=2E > Where does this line go? We recently added c# mode to elpa, and some peopl= e did not want it in core=2E I would classify that at a popular language Theo