From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xah Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: emacs-w3m question Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:10:16 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <88751286-afa9-4afc-bc4c-b7d5c39179c3@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> References: <87vdvdu4mp.fsf@literaturlatenight.de> <74160b46-e541-436a-a776-c8bd53d6cd55@o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <1f28a20e-0c9f-4478-a85c-27ae40ed7fc9@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <4d476218-bd76-4d41-8a12-1428dfba9e9b@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <7b5a888e-d50f-4061-8854-9832b9330411@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226090454 6133 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2008 20:40:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:40:54 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 07 21:41:57 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KyY9L-00031Q-65 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:41:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KyY8D-0007Im-Kg for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:40:37 -0500 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs Original-Lines: 44 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.185.159 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1226088616 10725 127.0.0.1 (7 Nov 2008 20:10:16 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.6.185.159; posting-account=bRPKjQoAAACxZsR8_VPXCX27T2YcsyMA User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.22, gzip(gfe), gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:164230 comp.emacs:97329 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:59564 Archived-At: Dear Alan MORON, > Not at all. He's merely saying, in a somewhat polemic way, that he > doesn't find them useful himself, and is mystified that other people do. > That doesn't make him an idiot. the question is not about whether he is a idiot. If u r not a idiot, you should know. the argument here, is about his idiotic, perhaps careless, claim that the numerical keypad and arrow keys are useless; a opinion made to support his view that w3m mode should not have the arrows keys to move cursor. my response, is to point out the degree of his idiocy in his wanton claim about keyboard design, by for example, pointed out data entry industry, the field of ergonomics, and with explicit example that one can test oneself on about how the numerical keypad and the arrow keys are more efficient by significant margins than the number row keys or Ctrl+fbnp key combo. You, in regard to this section of the debate, are a moron, first, by claiming that the number row is actually more efficient than the numbers on numerical keypad, totally ignoring the context. When i pointed out your moronicity by your ignorance of context either intentiaonally or unintentionally, you are a moron again, by claiming that 6-finger typing is also touch-typing. The above sequence of events can be seen in google groups, here: http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.help/browse_frm/thread/7c08121e215= fd383 i hope nobody remove their messages. The message that started this sequence of debate, is this: http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.help/msg/daf6748a5f24ddf8 anyone is welcome to verify my interpretaation of this sequence of debate. Xah =E2=88=91 http://xahlee.org/ =E2=98=84