From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Risky local variable mechanism Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 08:35:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87zml2vuq4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87mzhbly89.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r76fkth6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200602080149.k181nhQ21836@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87mzh2ft7f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r76eihbg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hd7afnkv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87hd7aqv4u.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8764nqfl97.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139430196 22897 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2006 20:23:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, Luc Teirlinck , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 08 21:23:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6vpm-0007Yq-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:22:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6vpj-0006b1-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:22:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6s53-0007xA-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:22:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6qIR-0004jq-HD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 09:27:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6pU7-0006nM-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 08:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.95.6.197] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6pXN-00069Q-TY; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 08:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 537D01E4301; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:35:47 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <8764nqfl97.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:00:01 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50210 Archived-At: >> After all, the variables we're talking about here are things like >> comment-start, paragraph-separate, indent-tabs-mode, etc. Will Emacs >> 23 (to be released in 3006 ;-) have something like this? > > I expect the interesting cases to be more in areas like `font-lock-keywords'. In my proposal, font-lock-keywords is considered risky, so the user is never asked whether or not to add it to the whitelist.