From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calling Info-find-file from other parts of Emacs Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:48:02 +1000 Message-ID: <87zmg2dsjx.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87zmgj8i4u.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87y7w3tih3.fsf@zip.com.au> <87slm9z0cu.fsf@jurta.org> <87slm6dkkb.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151193001 2359 80.91.229.2 (24 Jun 2006 23:50:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 25 01:49:45 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuHsj-0004xo-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:49:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuHsi-0006E0-Vc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FuHsV-0006DD-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FuHsT-0006AY-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuHsS-0006A5-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:49:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FuI3y-0007rn-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808D0329691 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:49:17 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2439.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.36.57]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k5ONnD6k005166 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:49:16 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FuHrA-0002CW-00; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:48:04 +1000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56161 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > Doesn't help if displaying the buffer caused a new dedicated frame to be > created Seems like that case works. > (even worse if the window manager requires the user to manually > place new frames). Ah, not sure about that case. > If you don't want to display a buffer, then please, just don't > display it: Yes, point taken, but as a way of not having it get intimate with the details of info.el it's not too terrible.