From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp date/time functions and RFC 3339? Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:52:36 +0900 Message-ID: <87zmax4brf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <17746.41387.298537.794187@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <17747.59876.83345.935097@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87slgr8fr5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <17750.32424.766478.872614@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163300062 9707 80.91.229.2 (12 Nov 2006 02:54:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 02:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 12 03:54:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gj5Sv-0005eA-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:53:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gj5Sv-0000tC-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gj5Sj-0000se-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gj5Sh-0000s9-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gj5Sh-0000s6-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:52:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [203.216.5.72] (helo=smtp02.dentaku.gol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gj5Sg-0002NU-3i; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:52:46 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-104-224.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.104.224] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1Gj5Sc-0001od-JV; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:52:42 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 410A42F43; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:52:37 +0900 (JST) Original-To: raman@users.sf.net System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <17750.32424.766478.872614@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (T. V. Raman's message of "Sat\, 11 Nov 2006 17\:53\:44 -0800") Original-Lines: 15 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62091 Archived-At: "T. V. Raman" writes: > all uses of rfc 3339 I've seen in atom feeds use the T. I was being a bit facetious when I said "nobody" -- but indeed, my impression is that the T is pretty unpopular, so many people adopt the the same format without it. [So any parsing function should parse it with or without the T (presumably accepting a space or underline in place of it). Of course it should be easy to print either variant using format-time-string.] -Miles -- My spirit felt washed. With blood. [Eli Shin, on "The Passion of the Christ"]