From: Markus Triska <markus.triska@gmx.at>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: acm@muc.de, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>,
rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Nonsensical byte compiler warning.
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:35:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zm5o1fnd.fsf@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86bqi430kv.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed\, 04 Apr 2007 12\:17\:52 +0200")
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> But not even for that the reported number is really helpful since it
> does not return the line number of the start or end of the defun
> (which would give the user the clue that the line number is not
> related to the point of error, but rather the function definition),
> but rather a line in the function body that is somewhat close to the
> actual beginning of the defun.
That depends on whether an "interactive" declaration is present. See
byte-compile-lambda in bytecomp.el.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-01 17:14 Nonsensical byte compiler warning David Kastrup
2007-04-01 18:10 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-01 20:57 ` Alan Mackenzie
2007-04-02 12:29 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 4:48 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-04 6:15 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-04 8:19 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-04 8:46 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-04 9:50 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-04 10:17 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-04 12:35 ` Markus Triska [this message]
2007-04-04 18:25 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-04 22:13 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-05 6:52 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-05 7:55 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-06 12:56 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-06 15:11 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-08 20:47 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-09 15:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-10 3:53 ` Glenn Morris
2007-04-10 17:27 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-11 4:00 ` Glenn Morris
2007-04-05 18:01 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-04 20:08 ` Alan Mackenzie
2007-04-04 21:45 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-04 22:11 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-05 5:44 ` Markus Triska
2007-04-08 1:21 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-08 11:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zm5o1fnd.fsf@gmx.at \
--to=markus.triska@gmx.at \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.