From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-mode, please change the name of function org-metaleft etc Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:34:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87zlxzxhe9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <47279F39.2010401@gmail.com> <472897D8.9030600@gmail.com> <4728AE09.10402@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193852220 31029 80.91.229.12 (31 Oct 2007 17:37:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dominik@science.uva.nl, "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 31 18:37:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InHUv-0007PT-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:36:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InHUl-0000Cd-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InHSj-0007rN-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InHSh-0007qZ-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InHSh-0007qT-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:39 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InHSg-00067N-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so267689nfh for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:34:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=87Epp7LJuDQ3pD795e3qUSCmxG/uL/q5kbZCnzlSTbs=; b=JFkI8GnqoMzs7hCjcHb/K+X0uMNEV1F+uVIvq93eeu1C7/L+Ib40ml5Db+oJchr84FC21PJTDmm7mzsqYD33AzpR4v+0HVwuR4elALQKYUb/SrwAsdgdQCHocNybLahZOLWKmUtPVuDG9A8BGLoBtN7jzb3RL56mulBJ+GV+BL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=Sziqs71IXLgEHL9UsuryPVFmDTj/kjJLOJqcKKthrLY2YpLZatCAvYwtjTTqwke/tsDLBgX6O1mOob/XqBd7hC+y0tfMU3isz8v5HjZV7yD9yhoNxhkrlG2hB5dFIW7cNCJGXHp72OaMACQAuZ/dwE6WkMes87jPm80ACwVDTKQ= Original-Received: by 10.86.62.3 with SMTP id k3mr6771543fga.1193852074079; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [78.113.180.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm1770662mue.2007.10.31.10.34.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD1AD1575BA; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:34:22 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <4728AE09.10402@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:32:09 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82237 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> The function name does not describe what it does. It is of course, as >> Bastien pointed out, quite hard to name this function after that ... > > I'd suggest org-electric-left as better than org-metaleft. The word > electric is used in other commands that act differently according to > context, and it does not tie it to a specific key binding. A simple M-x occur on org.el gives: 25151:(defun org-shiftmetaleft () 25198:(defun org-metaleft (&optional arg) 25283:(defun org-shiftleft () 25301:(defun org-shiftcontrolleft () I guess `org-electric-left' won't be descriptive enough, even if it is a good start. -- Bastien