From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: File specific exporting of tags Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:37:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87zlx9drdq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <473E4628.7030809@gmail.com> <52D89C75FEE9444E8D9C016E3730098306CE66@chsa1036.share.beluni.net> <4741EDA9.3080601@gmail.com> <52D89C75FEE9444E8D9C016E3730098306CE69@chsa1036.share.beluni.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuSMb-0006iP-D8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:38:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuSMZ-0006hB-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:38:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuSMZ-0006h2-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:37:59 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuSMZ-0006OJ-AS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:37:59 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1229841ugf for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:37:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52D89C75FEE9444E8D9C016E3730098306CE69@chsa1036.share.beluni.net> (Egli Christian's message of "Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:31:03 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Christian and all, I'd just like to add a bit of clarification on two points. "Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" writes: > I appreciate the time you took to analyse the problem and propose a > solution. I was just hinting that producing a patch to the documentation > is very easy (in fact that is how I got into hacking on org-mode :-)) Sure, and if anyone *likes* this way of proposing a change, let's go for it! But unless one is 95% sure that the patch is accurate (e.g. when it is a change on typos), I guess it will be enough to send a suggestion -- especially if using diff is more work than anything... > and will IMHO give the developers more time to focus on the code. The > documentation in org.texi is basically text with some markup and can be > adapted easily, so no lisp know-how required. It's been several times that the word "developpers" appeared in its plural form... While I would happily put myself into that category, I think people should bare in mind that I'm only providing patches and suggestions -- and Carsten _is_ the developper ! Having successfully hijacked a mailing list should not be a reason to be held as a "developper". :) -- Bastien