From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:49:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87zlh1rf65.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ocxxrjnh.fsf@canonical.com> <874ozp4ld3.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87ocxrgm4g.fsf@canonical.com> <87y6wvhxrk.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <8763jwg1j8.fsf@red-bean.com> <87y6wsd0ll.fsf@red-bean.com> <8763jwb81u.fsf@red-bean.com> <87tz7at8m0.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233788400 4304 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2009 23:00:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Jason Earl To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 00:01:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUqjw-0006a8-Dg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:01:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51259 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUqid-000832-70 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:59:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUqYl-0004Vp-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUqYj-0004V4-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:49:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32892 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUqYj-0004Uy-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.193.61]:42193) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUqYh-00075G-Fz; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43644 helo=floss ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUqYd-0003fK-8Y; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:49:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:48:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108757 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Karl Fogel writes: >> "Spot-check a branch-sync change." > > This is another merge commit that your tool appears to mishandle. When > checking out the cvs trees before and after the change I see no > difference to the corresponding git trees, except that the files that > were renamed in this merge appear under both names in the older CVS > checkout. The latter may be a limitation of cvs when checking out a > date, or it could be due to an invalid direct manipulation of the cvs > history (manually adding a branch tag instead of going through cvs > add/rm). Or more likely, direct manipulation of the files in the CVS repository (i.e., renaming). Thanks. I probably could have done the same checks you just did, but I have to admit that by that point I was ready to be doing something else for a bit (these verifications take a lot of legwork :-) ). >> "Check that all tags are present." > > These tags are all present in the git tree. May be a bug in the > git->bzr conversion. Yup. We'll look into it. >> "Check that all branches are present." > > Likewise, the branches are all present in the git tree. Okay, thanks. > The master-UNNAMED-BRANCH contains changes belonging to revisions that > are unreachable from any branch tag. The name was constructed by > parsecvs since such unreferenced commits cannot exist in git. Actually, > this branch combines several such anonymous branches, but parsecvs could > not tell them apart. I never would have thought of that. Hunh. Thanks. -Karl