From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New sync'd branch Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:20:01 +0900 Message-ID: <87zl9jk2cu.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <878wh9qaku.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <83praic5r5.fsf@gnu.org> <83d46gcnsb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ocq0l2hw.fsf@iki.fi> <83ab1kcmi5.fsf@gnu.org> <877hwom4og.fsf@telefonica.net> <878wh47z7z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87y6p3luq3.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eiqv7mxm.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87prafliq3.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251498043 32731 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2009 22:20:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 29 00:20:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mh9oC-00050M-2N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:20:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh9oB-0005mU-9e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh9nm-0005es-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh9nh-0005dB-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48251 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh9nh-0005d7-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]:53584) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh9nf-0004QW-Fx; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.231.109.79.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.109.79] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1Mh9nd-0007cu-9i; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:20:01 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A7ABDF8D; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:20:01 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87prafliq3.fsf@telefonica.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:41:08 +0200") Original-Lines: 20 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114795 Archived-At: =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: >> It saves you hours elsewhere. > > Compared against the other DVCS's? Not on my experience. git's speed > advantage is not *that* large. It's very, _very_ fast. It's also far more powerful than most, and offers a very flexible and intuitive paradigm (when many other systems are still lamely attempting to follow the creaky old models). Anyway, it's pretty clear that many, many, very smart people really like git, _despite_ the strong competition. Why do you think that is? [Hint: your silly claim that it's all because of "linux worship" are just clueless flamebait.] -Miles --=20 Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time. -- Steven Wright