Re: Completions in Semantic

[Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>]

Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:
> On a more general note, this is one of the drawbacks to the approach
> taken in semantic/complete.el, i.e. trying to reimplement completion.
> We've painstakingly ironed out a lot of bugs in the standard Emacs
> completion code, and it makes no sense to redo all that for Semantic
> unless there's a good reason.  (Not to mention inconsistency issues).

Yes, and it won't properly respect user customizations of the completion
stuff.

[I've often felt that semantic was acting "weird" during completion, but
it's hard to pin down exactly what the problem is (by the time I realize
that it is, I often can't reproduce the offending key sequence).]

-Miles

-- 
Vote, v. The instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to make a fool of
himself and a wreck of his country.