From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:53:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87zl6vskq0.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4eerm8w.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4yy7qba.fsf@yahoo.com> <87vdiiof1d.fsf@canonical.com> <87d44ceg5s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bpjwe46n.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257787479 14540 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2009 17:24:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, jearl@notengoamigos.org, Daniel Clemente To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 18:24:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N7XyU-0000dQ-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:24:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XyT-0002Yu-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XV4-0002Vd-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XUy-0002UE-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40427 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XUy-0002U2-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:53:48 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:51775) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7XUx-0007hR-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:53:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38555 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N7XUu-0002gr-ML; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:53:44 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:38:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116748 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > I've put something on fencepost in ~schwab/emacs.bzr. Thanks! Simultaneously, Jason Earl has been working on this (note that he apparently can't post to this list; I don't know the reason for the bounces, and I'm able to receive other emails from him just fine). Jason also now has two new converted repositories: 1) http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-merges.tar.gz # Converted with the trunk version of bzr fastimport # (also known as "Ian Clatworthy's version") 2) http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-merges-jason.tar.gz # Converted with Jason's modified version of trunk bzr fastimport. # He says this conversion has the missing tags that we've discussed # before, and has the missing emacs-unicode branch (although it # appears to be called "emacs-unicode.remote"). So I think maybe Jason's is the one to test? But, Andreas, how was your "emacs.bzr" made? With bzr fastimport, or some other method? As we now have three conversions, we should figure out which one to concentrate on. Jason, if you see this but can't post a response, then respond personally to me and I'll forward your mail into the thread (as a workaround until you can fix your posting problem). -Karl