From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5273: 23.1; format-alist encode vs write-region-post-annotation-function Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:55:23 +1100 Message-ID: <87zl3ruwtw.fsf@blah.blah> References: <87eimhi83j.fsf@blah.blah> <87fx6gdzuu.fsf@blah.blah> <871vhj5c25.fsf@blah.blah> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265147860 18868 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2010 21:57:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 22:57:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQka-0002n7-CI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:57:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcQkZ-0002aO-Rk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NcQkV-0002a7-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39535 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcQkV-0002Zn-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQkT-0006TR-Ls for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46295) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQkT-0006TN-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQk2-0004dh-0G; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kevin Ryde Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5273 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5273.126514778217815 (code B ref 5273); Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2010 21:56:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQjO-0004dI-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:56:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout2-5.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.228] helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQjL-0004d9-1X for 5273@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:56:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A533C1DDAE0; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:56:08 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from blah.blah (ppp2338.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.35.56]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEE48C10; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:56:07 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by blah.blah with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQiR-0001iX-W5; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:55:24 +1100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:29:35 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34867 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > Yes, but at that outside point, we don't know if such a temp buffer will > be needed, and worse, we don't know how many (there can be several > annotation functions that each take a buffer as input and produce the > result into a new output buffer). Oh, well, a let-bound defvar holding a list of temp buffers to be added to by sub-functions. Or alternately make write-region (or build_annotations or whatever) take responsibility for temp buffers returned to it. It's too complicated for me, but one of those would seem better than kill-on-write.