From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Commit netiquette. Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:02:11 -0500 Message-ID: <87zl34kw5o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87eikjzaug.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266664133 22313 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2010 11:08:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, lekktu@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 12:08:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NinCc-00026E-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:08:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43170 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NinCb-0007dm-5s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NinBF-0006xA-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50152 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NinBC-0006ee-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nin6E-0007zm-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:02:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po35.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.83]:49953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nin6E-0007zT-DP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (adsl-99-96-75-7.dsl.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net [99.96.75.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po35.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o1KB2BjW026373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:02:12 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 743F6C05D; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:02:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:19:08 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121242 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> ---------------- >> Author: >> Summary: > >> blablabla >> ---------------- >> >> After that, empty header entries will get removed and the text is >> passed as-is to the backend who is then free to pass it as-is to >> the underlying VCS or to extract the various fields and do whatever >> it feels like with them. > >> This will not help those who use C-c C-a in vc-mode. > > I don't see how that interacts. Clearly C-a C-a would bring the text > into the body part of the message. Am I missing something? Also, this kind of behavior works perfectly fine in message-mode, in commands such as C-c C-y. So there is ample precedent. (I wonder if it might not be possible to re-use some of the mail-header code to implement this idea.)