From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno? Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkw6d5lm.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <83occmlogo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283016633 23475 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2010 17:30:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:30:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 19:30:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpPEX-0007Dp-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpPEW-0003x8-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58668 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpPDj-0003PF-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:29:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpOx6-0002LP-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:12:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpOx6-0002L9-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpOx1-00076V-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:12:19 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.38.73.98 ([83.38.73.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:12:19 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.38.73.98 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:12:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.38.73.98 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:plVcz9wJyfMtgfRMj9C/JSvuoNc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129347 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > . revision-id, an alternative method of specifying a revision, _is_ > unique, but it's long and a mouthful: > > eliz@gnu.org-20100828152310-v42vqrt01k788siu Even if that is a mouthful, why not include it on M-x report-emacs-bug?