From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Rose Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkvdv2yt.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4C94E03D.8090002@gmail.com> <87fwx699pc.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83tylmyclx.fsf@gnu.org> <4C961787.3090907@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284931670 26928 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 21:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Chad Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 23:27:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxRQK-0003ud-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:27:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxRQK-0003WU-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:27:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33282 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxRQE-0003WP-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxRQD-0003zg-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:34415 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxRQD-0003zO-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2010 21:27:39 -0000 Original-Received: from df01ppp074.eplus-online.de (EHLO beteigeuze.gmx.de) [212.23.104.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 23:27:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #8529601 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19C5NBC5vBCeJfkI2F4N0seeRtoKoKUjdqkrI1I9z cGSQP4C4enVqdR In-Reply-To: (Chad Brown's message of "Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:00:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130505 Archived-At: Chad Brown writes: > Question for the people who dislike transient-mark-mode and it's > related behaviors: > > Do you find yourself making an unwanted `highlighted region' using any > other method than C-xC-x? The potential candidates that come to mind > are `C-space and movement', shift-selection, and mouse-sweep. No. I never use `C-x C-x'. I never use shift-selection. I don't use the mouse to edit text either.