From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better process-kill-query prompt Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:08:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkiblwb8.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315703365 26140 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 01:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:09:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 03:09:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXw-0002ID-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:09:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXv-0004ja-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXr-0004jT-EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXn-0000kT-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXn-0000kO-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2YXm-0002G9-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.59.1.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:09:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mBhSpYHxfD8y5JgfVD/I1bOI7oY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143871 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Would installing the following patch be OK? [snip] > ! (yes-or-no-p "Buffer \"%s\" has a running process; kill it? " > ! (buffer-name))))) This change seems a no-brainer to me. I use some functions for killing groups of buffers (mostly Compile buffers) and too often that question pops up and I need to figure out which buffer still has a running process.