From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12412: 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:31:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87zk4wr8hv.fsf@altern.org> References: <87d31tlyf5.fsf@altern.org> <87har43fml.fsf@altern.org> <878vcg3e01.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347370361 30194 80.91.229.3 (11 Sep 2012 13:32:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12412@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 15:32:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZw-0000F2-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:32:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZt-0007So-2C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZq-0007SX-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZi-0000dK-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZi-0000dG-1y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQaM-0005CW-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12412 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12412.134737034619952 (code B ref 12412); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 13:32:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZl-0005Bl-KP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:65039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBQZj-0005Ba-I8 for 12412@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so302870wey.3 for <12412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:31:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=8zRYXZIvBPr1OR6N6/KKa3oGfQUifrtYo/d9OrOhZYg=; b=wJwedaO3IkFqUBmDQRO6SdKmSdZNoIYk3zzI5FlM2RhYt6chT/oEHIQ2F+rqPQ+Wap h6wPcO+ffPqNMyDtTDJqshKUdtbjiBUi0vKSrrOlGi8QNGRLxfU+p7zcZ57WxFJ5uCPS OPQ4uHKXcyvQg0elxAYNzU92eorcVWA9b+ROpr3cUVMU1txXQ889eecIE0WkkPFzEqo9 xF/9avUWocyNk9MgQcKe0ZWI+TMgX7LGqH1vIvYf3DimE/2FzX7vWq54GP5uO4fM6p/y CjYJKU13gtMCBfjSZWKM+3Yq8kmX7dQ7YbAMDeex2aTcYzJjJ0CO96bhlPc+T2w7LhxH 1EwA== Original-Received: by 10.217.1.79 with SMTP id m57mr9669987wes.121.1347370300962; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm2621029wiz.1.2012.09.11.06.31.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C6F389A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:31:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:25:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64101 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Bastien writes: > >> And from the info page above, I infer that the `clean' >> and `distclean' targets should remove the .elc files. > > No, they are distributed. What do you mean by "distributed"? I'm using the emacs-24 bzr branch. There is no .elc files here. After building from that branch, I expect `make distclean' to remove the .elc files. I also expect `make clean' to do this, actually. What is wrong in my expectations here? -- Bastien