From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12702: 24.2; Orgmode Refile complains "Not bookmark format" Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87zk39xtpk.fsf__980.588937136595$1351257234$gmane$org@bzg.ath.cx> References: <50855D96.9000302@univ-brest.fr> <03liexyx5m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5087B1AB.3030404@univ-brest.fr> <87d30729b0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351257225 23324 80.91.229.3 (26 Oct 2012 13:13:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12702-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Schaeffer To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 15:13:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjjS-0001li-Ui for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:13:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjjL-0004vx-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjid-0002oI-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjic-00061f-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:12:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjiX-0005zd-9V; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjkb-0008Hb-Vg; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12702-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D12702.135125728731804 (code D ref 12702); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12702-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2012 13:14:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjkN-0008Gv-M2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:42261) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRjkL-0008Go-Lq for 12702-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:14:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq7so348169wib.15 for <12702-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:12:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:references:user-agent :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=A2VxvMDyE0NAPIvQJoLcWwEeWJbaZ6+lM4RZvFhWihM=; b=n00FidmyToB8QpINt+27pTVqh6VrqCuaQuGX0ABeXi94tVxNWEb6o8VFpyfgtvA3gn OpDgJYpdVlmRW+l85eixSnlWO/LeKHatsbTXd6RC62s3apSS9lcGF+jWDYU+MF5TzZkm PuroyHQ9JVZLX2hs+mxryf/BGiyL0yw62H3q1/rXkkrxxxH1dlPx4Pi0lOrjoV72c7/H 1nQih9o1da2fE6/mp0dvk7sHRH2ByJtlWT1JCWShiXzRHxaarKbP+uQTeXvOqPTvZ/PJ ahMqfsh0/O+ehm5xm14bqnHDXz2GUXFZt4vL3JkAM7Zg5vjSJ7UQ9lDUuUuJHoXQWePe culA== Original-Received: by 10.180.97.35 with SMTP id dx3mr4850086wib.14.1351257155913; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f1sm15066783wiy.2.2012.10.26.06.12.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41AA622E8A; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:12:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:57:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66074 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, Stefan Monnier writes: > IOW, if needed we could wrap the calls to bookmark-set in > with-demoted-errors, but maybe those errors are signaled late enough > already that while the command signals an error, it did do what it was > expected to do. I've now wrapped calls to `bookmark-set' within `with-demoted-errors' in Org, the capture and the refile processes will not be stopped by corrupted bookmark files. I'm now closing this bug. Thanks, -- Bastien