From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [new exporter] two unexpected behaviours of an #+INCLUDEd #+call
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:27:07 +0100
Message-ID: <87zk36r510.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87bofzrf85.fsf@ed.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSUoX-0003n0-5K
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:30:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSUoV-0005JJ-MQ
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:30:13 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:52508)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSUoV-0005I6-Fu
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:30:11 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gg4so2331997wgb.30
	for <Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bofzrf85.fsf@ed.ac.uk> (Myles English's message of "Thu, 18
	Oct 2012 16:07:22 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode <Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

"Myles English" <mylesenglish@gmail.com> writes:

> Given the situation below, I would expect that the block named xxx
> would never be evaluated:
>
> #--------------------- file b.org -------------------
> #+TITLE:     b.org
> #+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: export
> #+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport
>
> * A heading            	   :noexport:
>
> #+INCLUDE: "c.org"
>
> #--------------------- file c.org -------------------
> * A Heading in c.org
> #+name: xxx
> #+BEGIN_SRC sh
> echo "Evaluated" > c.out #+END_SRC
>
> #+call: xxx()
>
> #----------------------------------------------------

:noexport: doesn't mean Babel blocks within shouldn't be evaluated. It
just means contents will eventually be ignored.

> And maybe it isn't evaluated but the call is still processed to some
> extent upon latex export:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC sh :shebang "#!/usr/bin/env bash" :tangle eval_bug.sh
> emacs -Q --batch --eval "(progn
>                (add-to-list 'load-path
>                  (expand-file-name \"./lisp/\"))
>                (add-to-list 'load-path
>                  (expand-file-name \"./contrib/lisp/\" t))
>                (require 'org-e-latex)
>                (org-babel-do-load-languages
>                 'org-babel-load-languages
>                 '((sh . t)))
>                (find-file \"b.org\")
>                (org-e-latex-export-to-latex))"
> #+END_SRC
>
>  $ ./eval_bug.sh
> Loading /home/myles/.emacs.d/plugins/org-mode/lisp/org-loaddefs.el (source)...
> OVERVIEW
> Loading vc-git...
> OVERVIEW
> OVERVIEW
> Reference 'xxx' not found in this buffer
>
> Removing the :noexport: results in the same message as above, removing
> the #+call causes c.org to be included but even adding these line to the
> batch function above will not cause the block to be evaluated
> (i.e. there is no c.out written):

This should be fixed in master. Thank you for the report.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou