From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unuseful keybindings Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:27:24 +0530 Message-ID: <87zk14erzf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sj73qzvl.fsf@gmail.com> <87623zquvw.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7zdud3.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehiiu5x7.fsf@gnu.org> <876A7D1112084247AE53F7EE42B4587C@us.oracle.com> <80ehih3hlj.fsf@somewhere.org> <87pq21iwrw.fsf@yandex.ru> <87AE81CEB91846DB94BC5F3B40C788DE@us.oracle.com> <50D64318.5030501@yandex.ru> <0FBA2D9ECA214D82B5C65E5A09E7EE19@us.oracle.com> <50D71824.90601@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356274436 31127 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2012 14:53:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: public-emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, 'Sebastien Vauban' , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 23 15:54:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmmwM-0005kX-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:54:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmmw8-0008Ns-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmmw5-0008Nn-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmmw0-0007Tg-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:64693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmmw0-0007TS-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:53:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp2so3571234pbb.15 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:53:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=yoZwA8lDofbyQqNn5W6w5bVkjjnoqa0jSXtjTtJ1iA4=; b=fiPVChK1ZXmJ4Qy0Gr8GwbQwFaJk9h0rtSjF5Pnu9uKh+Ezl/jwUs/HfADNgT68ZvY sJPIcH0/tEKJxXgq5tZYpEEBtvRIpeIbtePNpJJmatXq4Y1Ms99B0g82eQleELiXgqSq vqRwLXL+YEe7EaJafYrFjnUgNq345PgHqhT/NthyZJ8j+uStdywrqCW/5p0rzpulEQzS 6qrWqR7vdx3MtSbXRlxfWiQvZJC0h5eAadh0ncl2LX8Ktu3dyC4tsYC0RQJfAoNxUeKb fNmYJC8y9YbGVNKRd0zoAdbHN3x2pnSMM9ekdV3s8BDbLq1VIYiOwaVmx4G05BYJehQW 3wrw== X-Received: by 10.68.253.102 with SMTP id zz6mr57883803pbc.99.1356274427537; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:53:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.62.80.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm11109380pav.22.2012.12.23.06.53.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:53:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50D71824.90601@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:41:40 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.42 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155811 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > The possible reason why those keys are so nice and still mostly have > no bindings is they are far from the home row, so the expectation is > they can only be used for one-off commands, not in a sequence in the > middle of other commands during an editing session. I am a touch-typer. (Even) accessing `%', `(' keys slows me down considerably. Using F-Keys for routine tasks is definitely beyond question. As far as I am concerned, any discussion on F-Key is NA or Don't Care for me. --