From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch to bookmark.el Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:37:27 -0600 Message-ID: <87zjyezviw.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> References: <87zkeqhod2.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <87pqfmcupi.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <1324329297.5507.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87vcpbi05a.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <1324422224.1891.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87zkemg6u6.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <5138B450.6050000@gmail.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362695856 29449 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2013 22:37:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 22:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matthias Meulien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 07 23:38:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDjRo-0006EI-DD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:38:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60366 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDjRS-0002Ak-LU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:37:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDjRN-0002Ae-Vx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:37:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDjRK-00019r-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:37:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]:46840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDjRK-00019k-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:37:30 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so1285286ieb.1 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=MED8yVpyzM1pgxfsHnt7rIKKcZZCmJZWm6DYRV05Aqo=; b=TIFpRpBbQYLELqrKmwSmu7UJHD4Ls/VtK8frW4f/8nVAhFlpEtU3Y4WkpwOGsRN82y URNxNPETPZb7g/5MibiavX+RQFiaYOccfb3PNWJsifk3G/AMVvCoNWURabW57nclsOUM o94G3GtDDeNnMZiQ17002doICdtSKtZzxMTSAct7ikwmfkPjDJixkTz3EoanDYq+rp/j YYXKwjTz1hTN4qhjf7xkspKHRgW654ur25PmIjBWz3rPhfAPlUCtB9emcCoIK2LdmK16 WftMq+nWJRY7oxTSVmfUsqVTK+fp8zqffPoriHBfLaDtiz0thmeEOxhL7BTcoeM4or4Z z23A== X-Received: by 10.50.180.197 with SMTP id dq5mr15507788igc.22.1362695849579; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from kwarm.red-bean.com (74-92-190-113-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.92.190.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i10sm28574322igz.9.2013.03.07.14.37.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5138B450.6050000@gmail.com> (Matthias Meulien's message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:37:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157568 Archived-At: Matthias Meulien writes: >> (...) That'll do fine, thank you. I look forward to reviewing! >> >> More soon, >> -Karl > >Well, was there a problem with my patch? More than one year later the >source repository does not include it... And the bookmarks buffer >still look the old way. > >I can update the patch if one explains what trouble there was with the >previous one. My bad -- they are applied now; sorry for dropping this ball. The bookmark menu buffer looks better now, thank you! -Karl