From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Sosa Mayor Subject: Small bug? Strange behaviour of Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:56:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjctdzxo.fsf@pedroche.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfYDz-0000xi-5p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:55:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfYDt-0004J4-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:55:31 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfYDt-0004Iv-9T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:55:25 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfYDn-0004Zk-AE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:55:19 +0200 Received: from 95.91.216.244 ([95.91.216.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:55:19 +0200 Received: from joseleopoldo1792 by 95.91.216.244 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:55:19 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, I have the following template for capture --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ("tp" "TODO privado" entry (file+headline "~/Documents/org/privat.org" "General") "* TODO %?\n SCHEDULED: %t ") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It works perfectly, except from a small strange behaviour. If I try to change the included date for schedule using C-c C-s, the cursor in the appearing calendar is always situated on the day BEFORE today, instead of on the present date. It is maybe a small bug? Or is this intended so (and in this case, why?)? Many thanks in advance! -- :: Igor Sosa Mayor :: joseleopoldo1792@gmail.com :: :: GnuPG: 0x1C1E2890 :: http://www.gnupg.org/ :: :: jabberid: rogorido :: ::