From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19043: 25.0.50; [PATCH]: faces for VC modeline state indicator Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjbtsool.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87fvdnt5qj.fsf@telefonica.net> <874mu2tb4o.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415984553 18493 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2014 17:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 14 18:02:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKGP-0000JQ-NA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:02:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKGP-0005ze-C2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKFD-0004Ft-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:01:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKF4-0002Oy-GX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:01:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKF4-0002Os-EC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKF3-0005MQ-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19043.141598441120535 (code B ref 19043); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2014 17:00:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKEA-0005KH-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp11.acens.net ([86.109.99.135]:18946 helo=smtp.movistar.es) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpKE1-0005J5-Q8 for 19043@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:00:05 -0500 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0207.5466350C.0140, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (80.26.207.197) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 54615F2D001ED2DC; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:59:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:31:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96024 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think we should push defaults (since they are what will be used by > almost everyone) that are good. (Or "best".) Since you did this patch, > you probably think that the defaults could be better. That's true, I use values that are better *IMO*. Preparing the patch consisted on removing those values for achieving a neutral impact on appearance. > So I think we should push a change that includes these better > defaults... In my experience, contributing a patch to Emacs is difficult enough when only technical issues are considered. It is a nightmare when personal opinion is a key part. Please let's not block this feature just because it does not address an orthogonal aspect that we can take care of later. Just to convince you to stop asking me for default values, I'll mention that on my setup edited files are shown with bright red text ;-)