From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 68bcf86 2/4: package/names: :group can be given a list Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 02:29:35 +0900 Message-ID: <87zj9nykjk.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20150112112953.11913.47601@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <871tn0yo6j.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87a91om0dv.fsf@yahoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421083821 11448 80.91.229.3 (12 Jan 2015 17:30:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nicolas Richard Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 12 18:30:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YAioe-0005PS-WB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35656 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAioe-0003nk-CR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAioH-0003ZY-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAioE-0002xP-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:34315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAioD-0002tc-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942A41C38B1; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 02:29:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6BEFF1A2CFC; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 02:29:35 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87a91om0dv.fsf@yahoo.fr> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181184 Archived-At: Nicolas Richard writes: > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > > Just like we don't like '(lambda ...), we don't like '(... (lambda ...) > > > ...) either (tho it's still found at many places in Emacs's source code > > > since you can't "grep" for it quite as easily). Better use > > > `(... ,(lambda ...) ...) instead, so the lambda is byte-compiled. > > > > Doesn't Emacs support #', and wouldn't that be more readable? > > I don't think it will help : > `(... ,#'(lambda ...) ...) doesn't look more readable and > #'(... (lambda ...) ...) would be wrong I'm suggesting '(... #'(lambda ...) ...) to tell the byte-compiler that the lambda expression is a function, and can be replaced by an equivalent function (ie, the byte-compiled version).