From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use of dedicated windows in gdb-mi.el Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87zj8maltt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87h9uynckc.fsf@gmail.com> <83iofedfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <877fvun97j.fsf@gmail.com> <83fvaid8sa.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvaf9jj2.fsf@gnu.org> <878ug7axhr.fsf@gmail.com> <837fvr9frq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sief9ezy.fsf@gmail.com> <831tlz9deh.fsf@gnu.org> <8761bb9cq8.fsf@gmail.com> <048211e0-0bf4-4c69-8908-aae20a2e58fb@default> <877fvraq0n.fsf@gmail.com> <013f998a-bd26-4938-9112-30a2e95e8dc4@default> <877fvqc1ar.fsf@gmail.com> <83siee97mv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423512817 3107 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2015 20:13:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 09 21:13:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YKui8-0002TS-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:13:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKui7-0002tv-SS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:13:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKui4-0002tN-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKui0-00010O-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]:56830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKui0-00010A-9C; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k11so20496818wes.5; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:13:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=qpD7fVJ8TrGmluXqIjtGWu6hyJuSspmR+cnnqUuJ6Xg=; b=HS54H8o7JoJzVpYI+QiKUTnUcFrOkSr5FeXFHLwVoC/URJsuc4fJGxP4Z+7gfwK3x+ PLbVCL4BD1FE9cwooJJeWk4pvhCNPCewn0f/+ubo73Xu3zzB2KWKG79Jt+je4eRdENJe LTkXl3B+9TTxJS1c9NIG+Kmy0oy3FNHgsuDuVfEl6pBt3it4aKhzkQDhqfX0GfRL6GMw c7uNuEg0xIcRUHttitR2Vkl30lUY/+IFF5Z1W8fGBKrKB/b3SRDZKSk3iKGs5X9+vC1h Q1+DzBJ2dOJ3R0ReJE7jOTL5AfR96QDvKySGk8Cbpofos+Ypyk5OUp507Mm+hl1XRttG rbmQ== X-Received: by 10.194.189.77 with SMTP id gg13mr44395402wjc.81.1423512807760; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:13:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi6sm17753986wjc.34.2015.02.09.12.13.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:13:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83siee97mv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:01:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182738 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Oleh Krehel >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:50:04 +0100 >> >> I just issued "r" in `gdb', nothing else. Zero customizations and a >> dedicated *output* popped up. > > I proposed to add a defcustom to prevent that. I still think it would > be a good solution, at least for popping window. You're right, the dedicated window business was only a small part of the problem. The output window still pops up each time there's new output. So even if I switch to *scratch* in the window of *output*, which I can now do thanks to an advice, *output* will still pop up when something new is printed by the program. So this defcustom would really be handy.