From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:22:22 +1100 Message-ID: <87zivizlq9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87si1gx6wz.fsf@gnus.org> <86y4b5zvzt.fsf@gmail.com> <8760y9kwrk.fsf@gnus.org> <87wpqpjgwy.fsf@gnus.org> <83a8nk1cxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hrnc8x.fsf@gnus.org> <86io27obqf.fsf@realize.ch> <878u331tht.fsf@gnus.org> <86egcvo8ky.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454458991 1195 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2016 00:23:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 01:23:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDo-0005tE-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 01:23:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDn-0001c0-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:22:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDj-0001be-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:22:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDf-0000VL-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:22:55 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDf-0000Uu-4H; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aQlDH-0007vw-4T; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 01:22:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86egcvo8ky.fsf@realize.ch> (Alain Schneble's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:49:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aQlDH-0007vw-4T MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455063748.05992@azNHu9Zh9kFwpHQuDD36MQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199197 Archived-At: Alain Schneble writes: > If so, depending on how network resources are used, it may not release > them properly. They /might/ be released while the process is being > stopped. But will they be released in any case? After all, it sounds a > bit awkward to rely on such a behavior even if it would just work. > Doesn't it? That's not how things work. If you exit a program, all resources are released. There's nothing magical about threads. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no