From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23431: 25.0.93; EWW hangs Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 21:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87zis70wv5.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bn4nx1iq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87zis75ibn.fsf@gnus.org> <87d1p35e2g.fsf@gnus.org> <877ffb2c9a.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462303483 5405 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2016 19:24:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 19:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23431@debbugs.gnu.org, Juliusz Chroboczek To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 21:24:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvr-0002pJ-EP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 21:24:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43047 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvn-0001pO-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvd-0001Wd-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvR-0002Fl-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvR-0002CS-Cz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axfvO-0006E7-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23431.146230339523876 (code B ref 23431); Tue, 03 May 2016 19:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2016 19:23:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axfud-0006Cz-9r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axfuc-0006Cs-0Q for 23431@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axfuZ-0002RQ-2J; Tue, 03 May 2016 21:23:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 03 May 2016 15:16:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117681 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> Yeah, it's an extreme GIF, but Emacs shouldn't become (almost) unusable >> in the presence of such images... I mean, you have to kill the eww >> buffer to get anything done. >> >> You can get pretty much the same effect by visiting a page that contains >> a number of smaller animated images. > > Right, but it's not like this is new in 25 or anything, it's always been > like that. Oh, yeah, it's always been bad. People just notice more now that Emacs has a web browser. So I think it's unlikely that whatever we do about this is code is something that'll go to emacs-25. Unless there turns out to be a very simple thinko somewhere. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no