From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Huchler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lldb support Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:02:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87zil5fr3a.fsf@mail.de> References: <20161107150552.20e98985@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161107220815.606cd583@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <6c239d49-a92c-1495-7121-4808295a4fc2@dancol.org> <735f8965-609a-d0c2-82bc-19a2393186b6@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478912761 10038 195.159.176.226 (12 Nov 2016 01:06:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 01:06:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 12 02:05:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5MlE-0007yC-QQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:05:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5MlH-000356-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5MlA-000346-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:05:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5Ml7-0004mF-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45539 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5Ml7-0004lz-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:05:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5Mkh-0004g0-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:05:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:fowQZ6gFogWwGa5tvjcfDD9ERwc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209351 Archived-At: Sam Steingold writes: > What is wrong with replacing a GNU package with a non-GNU > package which is free software? > > How is it a loss for GNU? > > It seems that if there is a better free debugger than gdb, GNU can > switch the resources currently devoted to gdb to another project. I think Free is != free, bsd != gpl. One is copyleft the other not. Or like MS would call it the one is viral the other not.