From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25511: 26.0.50; modify-frame-parameters modifies undesignated parameter? Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:57:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87zidmy4ly.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5885B8D7.4040301@gmx.at> <5885DABE.9000408@gmx.at> <58870656.2090402@gmx.at> <58872061.1050900@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496667464 22123 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2017 12:57:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:57:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25511@debbugs.gnu.org, Katsumi Yamaoka To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 05 14:57:40 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrZj-0005UP-6J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:57:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrZo-0000gc-Hd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrYD-0007Hh-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrYA-0001P6-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrYA-0001P2-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrYA-0004mw-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25511.149666734418373 (code B ref 25511); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2017 12:55:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrXs-0004mH-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:34577) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHrXq-0004m3-Ml for 25511@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id d68so21894185ita.1 for <25511@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G6dukIEku+1FpUQy81Jf+vyzYSnnYS2rwc1N1jmEIfI=; b=pA93dzY4hzOYxQ7txrJSacUtudrKe5tuV32pOs8Bhgot39cxVLy3d0g7bMYr6vq9Pl z/XNWln7/cLqJM64zVqRKTkmtFlTtl+MMtcadLrv/uKSSfDgc3XV4mF769lzZ+iV0NcV 9qlWbyLAK58f5X0q196Rc/4BMBn3Vx6qt1pA4UI36+kANdrLUGT3ZrTEa5t11WS4bvwL rAniIMl/aPEIte/Rmytk8YWH0VoyD8DN7QgbiOzryu3AupYHj3tMQfZ60gDWGi0jZNFG As9ULGoHg6nbrZCnsoFy5fLqMXq03cPbDN12VNyas9e94E0w0tEhAoWvvOFGeb0S6eeo 6mlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G6dukIEku+1FpUQy81Jf+vyzYSnnYS2rwc1N1jmEIfI=; b=ncC7mmtNki+6eisPVFY92vuCGV30F1qdGNHWN3hAgJKXYjv25pwGfYGBOgQLyk3GKa YM8UaVupVLcipQ3xjizI5FGG/kRVopcgBD17itjiTNPjZ8L2CWblqrNUqfDiSq9fecod fGn2cQKRgP0FjfRFTT5R6gk8CATWWZ/rt80DhKSfEeLQbEA2ze4UFGn05w353tOwUWoZ z+OHsFy0vpXiR1IQLPxkWw9vpL3IG0qINdwTcDSA5FIzdJ46UzrCjCgO0nSEI9GBqO6A 39cQZzQD1PllMD3GdtyhJjFVgUdMWAJhs28bBN563aPv5/u2F3plem/RreiXXgRJrzxW Etsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDidJESwEQtoM6j5a8CcvRjZIcsR7CkR9ZFHQ9lF1d3DR1YOeaO LxSZSazPJ8r9jGs5 X-Received: by 10.36.69.218 with SMTP id c87mr10981655itd.48.1496667336871; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c77sm3429592iod.24.2017.06.05.05.55.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:55:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58872061.1050900@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:37:37 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133290 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Thanks for the suggestions about =E2=80=98after-make-frame-functions=E2= =80=99, >> =E2=80=98frame-inhibit-implied-resize=E2=80=99, and others. I didn't re= call >> I've been using =E2=80=98after-make-frame-functions=E2=80=99 for the oth= er >> purposes. ;-) I'll try them one by one from now on. Anyway, I >> concluded I should not use dirty codes such as advising the core >> functions, as much as possible. > > Advising is no problem per se. But =E2=80=98after-make-frame-functions= =E2=80=99 is > there so it's better to use it (and along the way find out if there are > any problems with it). Obviously, my proposal to use the workarea won't > work for Cygwin anyway, given you figures above. Is there something more to do with this bug?