From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS build-time configuration Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:27:43 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87zic5ftcw.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <871spif2se.fsf@yandex.com> <834lueez97.fsf@gnu.org> <87shhxex1d.fsf@yandex.com> <87lgnprhvo.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <83wp79erds.fsf@gnu.org> <87initrdxi.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <83vamtepgh.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmoln2yb.wl-nomiya@galaxy.dti.ne.jp> <1189406b-be59-8079-bd42-719955a1b84b@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500143321 20876 195.159.176.226 (15 Jul 2017 18:28:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 18:28:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 15 20:28:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnq-0004sb-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:28:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnw-0002xU-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnP-0002xI-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnM-0001Vx-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=47327 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnL-0001VT-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dWRnC-0002wD-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:27:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:45qBbzxdqQ9kjOckRemOvn4QbsY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216698 Archived-At: On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:17:26 -0700 Paul Eggert wrote: PE> While we're fiddling with GnuTLS configuration, is there any reason we use PE> separate configure-time checks for HAVE_GNUTLS3_AEAD, HAVE_GNUTLS3_CIPHER, etc., PE> instead of the more-typical approach of using GNUTLS_VERSION_NUMBER? If not, I PE> propose simplifying configuration by doing things in the more-typical way. See PE> Bug#27708. PE> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27708 Thank you for the suggestion. I did it that way because those pieces were not introduced at the same time. Also they may not be available with the same API in a future version. So I would prefer not to rely purely on the version. I won't close the bug report for now. Does anyone else have feedback? Paul, let me know what you think too. Thanks Ted