From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 15:37:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87zi90jvc9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59D88B8B.6050205@gmx.at> <87mv523r3k.fsf@gmail.com> <59DB2CA9.7000402@gmx.at> <59DB6A13.5030801@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507556296 15422 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2017 13:38:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 13:38:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Ola Nilsson , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 09 15:38:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YG1-0002rt-Nz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 15:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YG7-00076C-O8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFz-000762-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFu-0005Bq-DA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFu-0005Bh-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFt-0002qW-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.150755625810904 (code B ref 28605); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 13:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2017 13:37:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFV-0002po-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:56055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1YFT-0002pZ-J9 for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u138so23631331wmu.4 for <28605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 06:37:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=AiV/PKan6Stf669UWmWbqZDEihluqGlYgYSc+w0zUM0=; b=IdhaJeZyQ8EFj7GgDp4E4FbozmQxn5bCwxIK6Rpm76Vap8nYtsPy7UUGzbxjOvZnGF s9BPsjrOAzTeqjma1NXCduuxl6/QBeU3LdywN2FkQSjEHyV5HUsN5WXLOKVM99o/neis Q2KzHqgpS38XoD63CxZRnagfaMBU1ZweGO3W7MUJhtfmyfaCW2kvGZW4wzPRNtW3V+UP dd7/Kb5lROd/ZaU+gFCOuIKsLkO+XEiG9oov1NFCkuazXPsxsG9g6S4qiPIoWBvtKF1Z NONb2a3tzyg17SERmdMl5p/xgQkQ0EggRHgggNShwdPuz+B2eSAD38XxYaSNG6BKZ8rf HVbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=AiV/PKan6Stf669UWmWbqZDEihluqGlYgYSc+w0zUM0=; b=eHNG8ec4PhHnCW9UjQSHVX1xOIveBYEYnVgRUPCm1VsVnFHILd0XQ67Bz9NCpOxiM9 TiD7yNDonRv8YX1wOJsCafvRLW/IunPqVGDOS93eyAmB4Mv38Tln4kHFsPBMQp+Te0Q6 Q+yBw3m5/Vdlu5927I4RvgT/KzMOIuyltY12s0HaLa5ybIPWr/f19+F6nMbJDTjGFr/0 CLsRcf6xl5K/jH0Nno4AM9KXUi7+P4TooBADjLUwuSBYsGccz2xdFbFgvc8+P4Lda1ow CqhrmdWBTdkqpOvbe4e2W0o72sESI4z51ah2GpwhkSwhjgmhaZsV/swegGBAaO9jpkq6 adWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXScZEmwKKD+gjlMCh3z+z0ShUkWKzRSBO+dYz1jaZ2BRAVRDke /BOtTDv6bdcGQcf0jLhE/dc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAVtGbJKAvbiH2dsxUQLEG9t76u6FCTKqEBEi0jndJyd15BeEhhwq7xZqmFQEPTG2ZOLtN5+g== X-Received: by 10.223.136.170 with SMTP id f39mr8555694wrf.162.1507556249788; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 06:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w126sm9483496wme.25.2017.10.09.06.37.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 06:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <59DB6A13.5030801@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:22:43 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138121 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > I'm asking because Robert's fix for scroll bars looks so simple that it > really would be a shame if there existed no similar fix for the menus. > It would be nice, but... > And there's one question that's still not completely answered: Why did > (and do) some scalers see problems with the scroll bar and/or menu > positions and others don't? ... I see scroll bar issues, but the menus are in the right place (although I normally have the menu-bar turned off ;-) ) It may be because I'm running under KDE. I'll see if I can get a pure GNOME enviroment, that may behave differently. Robert