From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87zi231ar5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523889252 8021 195.159.176.226 (16 Apr 2018 14:34:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:34:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Branham Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 16:34:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Cp-0001zQ-HD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:34:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Ew-0001R5-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Dn-0000OG-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Di-0001QH-NP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Di-0001Pq-K6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Di-0004fL-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 31179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31179.152388926317866 (code B ref 31179); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:34:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85D5-0004e6-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55685) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85D3-0004dx-Bb for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Cl-0008UD-Bx; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:34:20 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Ca-0006nt-O1; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:33:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:29:19 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:145445 Archived-At: Alex Branham writes: > The situation definitely improves for me after closing the eww buffer, > but Emacs is still sluggish. I assumed these extra processes were to > blame, but perhaps that's not right. I don't know what else could be the > culprit though. Does `top' say that Emacs is using more CPU after opening and then killing the eww buffer than before? And how long does this last? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no