From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32226: shadowfile test failures Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:59:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhyk1yh2.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83r2jxzpvz.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9f0j2nq.fsf@gmx.de> <83wotoyewf.fsf@gnu.org> <87in58iy64.fsf@gmx.de> <83sh4cydv6.fsf@gnu.org> <87effwiwk9.fsf@gmx.de> <83o9f0yaji.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532181490 2526 195.159.176.226 (21 Jul 2018 13:58:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:58:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32226@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 21 15:58:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsOb-0000XD-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:58:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQh-0006Gc-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQX-0006FX-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQU-0003Hz-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQU-0003Hn-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQU-0006Bs-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32226 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 32226-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32226.153218157423733 (code B ref 32226); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32226) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2018 13:59:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsQ0-0006Ai-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:38945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgsPz-0006AU-0w for 32226@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([178.20.95.32]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhQxO-1fKNkP3rda-00Mbjx; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:59:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o9f0yaji.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2018 16:37:37 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/oPGkDpBaJt+DI+QUotKE37f+zpD4dEp2SaH0eehQMcDhLIrX0X CDcvlWpq3rjjwO4XDZZ0d9nJ8s68pze1nHlX8cHqnKk7IY8rsSC5kuSgKXoAWhoQTax4NjR fo9HfE5htX8ZwlZ1wGb1Si4Tw+N5cjiww770wi5Gwlv5WISwwgsZuKBCyg/+w4a0wPgD3df Sj7uU50mFkAgxc/36/9vA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:61izXEBanSc=:LHi+AUMa9oGm0PIEGLC+Yy CBvpQVNrXdRCpQWDBdeW9cFphfGcjGgH6YgZi14KbqFmCpRL68fxigCIAIbisdU1QMctv02PX 4lOUBSoOrlXJN6yJAzIE+yF8YQIs2qbfDea0KB2OGAhLQJZoGlhMmhcBLrIsK3SkKZAoyAmqB xHjKPu/4iJDEJQ63NZlnOvxhCuKRmUpj71UMtA2jArgg5RcdK8fJ952qV3thysx0yR9IB6tvD 2MpHRzOGXds9TLav8dTi9+zjdK0rxyvzp7Jel1ks2hBR/TFecMEqizQ7FnAD9J6dIzyjg3k1r aREpQAzn5CWS+MxvGcljXVcFTY08lCoUgu7dRIQGQQylkItxL4r7zxatzeNLKAo91GBx/8+Bg fmfIGuXt1K6XEN5Y99Sy2IwDZl+bl92SD6JAtwWIgqEjnSV3g7ielI3bg2s03oHV9l967HJnv qGZiN9zF1lSfbnzCFbLM40X3sm+tnK92p92fTPbzdybAeGmp9tbM1ylUpbhtHbg3b6ywmECX1 Jp/P9BhNAkeEnE2F0eAY49phekajzaNzADojQgtz00H4DS/dV49lcqFTTMyw8Uo4/AQlFbfBx 4oQ3bWm35DlgMawjKhQQQcToSa8ehE2niiJBBIm+9HKAhY/Ul0viXQP/sVUJ5ezPHO9CXwLdX Bd5LqKVV18LHugvxCiLo4OoJosUrWT8Wzkgn0lSWgh2BUqno7gzg9zdBrAYv0XZSIl+M/8e/0 mjcxYsl9gNMpAk8sjRCIOt9DlgiyhL4n8u64/KoMKTBspvpNCEYg8Z7LehRV9Kdev6fd6CBF X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148784 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't see why this would be impossible. The test suite is run from > the MSYS Bash anyway, and if I start Emacs from there, I get this: > > (executable-find "sh") > => "d:/usr/MSYS/bin/sh.exe" The test suite is also run interactively (that's what I do), so it cannot be guaranteed that (executable-find "sh") gives a non-nil result. For this case, there is the REMOTE_TEMPORARY_FILE_DIRECTORY trick. > (even though the directory where sh.exe leaves is not on the > system-wide PATH on my systems, although most other users do place it > on PATH). So use executable-find to get the absolute file name of the > shell, instead of a literal "/bin/sh", and I think everything else > should "just work", no? > >> So you shall declare a usable remote directory via that environment >> variable for the MS WIndows case. If you could give me a recipe how to >> setup a mock-up method for MS Windows - the better! > > Does the above fit the bill? If not, what else is needed for the > mock-up method? I will check your proposal next week, when I'm at work. Maybe it works, but likely I will find only an MS Windows machine which does not offer any sh.exe - that's Murphy. In that case, I will produce a patch which you could check. (All of this shouldn't stop us from closing this bug report, after confirmation of Glenn) Thanks, and best regards, Michael.