From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alex Branham Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21074: [PATCH] Add docs for two tabulated-list functions Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:41:28 -0600 Message-ID: <87zhs1hfo7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a8uwmq0d.fsf@mbork.pl> <871s5diy1q.fsf@gmail.com> <83won5d9ll.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547581216 16643 195.159.176.226 (15 Jan 2019 19:40:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:40:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 Cc: 21074@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 15 20:40:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUZE-0004AN-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:40:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUbL-0003T8-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUb7-0003Qn-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUb5-0002sS-Rg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUb4-0002qX-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUb4-0003mD-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Branham Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21074.154758129914489 (code B ref 21074); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2019 19:41:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUah-0003ld-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:41:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:33153) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjUae-0003lP-22 for 21074@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:41:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id i20so3681844otl.0 for <21074@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:41:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=XLnNF22JRSvGOegMW+g/jucFOgFLfR0rdzNFCZyF2VE=; b=hubf0NiG3yWqqEanXN8Kz14uAts+qkh3Sju9aXewA7Ys5hLGMk317+RC1/lhoGPv6d 26LtFRlzlTvGMb7Hc1AXE0+E1NJ2NhIzqFBnTfLRUKiXHKQDxWqnNWpsThlfSmmRmMwM z4MKHrvoLxNzfw0pPZSH+vOhbZzsvJLaEjFeRhGjW+MSx7DVWGAt5Xt8SmLkg3PI8Gn7 vgVciWgY0+ElDva4V+HUUob2LJoJGgjGSw+CWhrNHTStOYgNB08drkG7CjbtM3dYoUFO cOw44Sp4c3eqFohPLzAtXW0hwCi8KLSkxn39BAmwGnlRg4NGap0LInQlkDPx8+FCbTB0 H0lQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=XLnNF22JRSvGOegMW+g/jucFOgFLfR0rdzNFCZyF2VE=; b=ejKimSq6biqi54QikC1CV/whIafFJNb/9iu0vZpgInpe/AJndX42JwMw3q/SJErBx7 1Pdp4OkLwm0ZuimO0cmTwYNfyLvHGXt+UDoIeGTZTBSSHWY58ZYMdFQeobyPG/FNgWcX Sl8T5UXJTUmAl9M6fQTZAs1RDpUR3F9JR/GmP8EZG1LXCsjbZ3r2MVjgNdzIOyythDLq 1jxYwHQpgGCWKpU7LQnYENf2XgFiYFs/CL6fZrbHEYZiYCW/RosVWU72L+C0l7rJZBa1 ng4ZSLazBV4jum2r6YNJwJmL1Tp24Wb/WkKLQ2Kjxf3pq7dyKavPdlNRv3RHCcv9xj+d eV0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukePWOBvrj8DR1IAWhY9cGIu3e8RUO7VkBzVKcrTho+zDoJvCilU KiLZ2tejVFEPWdx3MlZ1H9r2tBo5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7UNAv0+pJc+8/oBFR2V6QT/a9agTF0Qm+TXPa8Bw4nhlzuVvDSYJIcFSbQiYxf+XPJOOBgXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2666:: with SMTP id a93mr3139420otb.235.1547581289986; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from earth (cpe-70-114-192-208.austin.res.rr.com. [70.114.192.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16sm1696420otl.29.2019.01.15.11.41.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <83won5d9ll.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154459 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Tue 15 Jan 2019 at 13:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Alex Branham >> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:19:13 -0600 >> >> This patch adds documentation for tabulated-list-get-{id, entry} to >> doc/lispref/modes.texi. > > Thanks, but what is the rationale for adding these two, specifically? I was surprised to see they weren't in there the other day when I was playing around with tabulated-list-mode. "How do I get the ID of the entry at point" is a pretty common question, I'd guess. Since I saw this bug on the bug tracker today I figured I'd submit a patch. If it doesn't belong in the manual feel free to ignore the patch (but then this bug should probably be closed). Thanks, Alex --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEeEJ4XAMgliXNXicpHkInolPpmscFAlw+N2gACgkQHkInolPp mse1GggAxMbmBeZIfsDyxQkIzL2RBKW3vW4FtYVnzGSK/uw+h8GS9QGmbgQmrEcz +6QdxgUm4RPBu5k0uuHu/0nqcvM3dpr0llK9yD4yZwhiRUFuQRBihJgNfUM//LqU Z7cw3VmWFeKIFaRAteeM7uRVEJ7cY1lt46U/YDmx36e5B92n6olEfQZp4m4mqZQ2 /tgH9OrA3GfLReIt2xH0aQ+2v498KHdaTv2ST2dX5n6+8VC0m2yy5hGyt8rHTwRs UC2NsTfZvSPI65YKEMRScF/zmEUYzBWIvqWxkgrCOdluZ/VpacKA4a+PF9rKhjnX Lsa9GI0DR0E5GYX2Xz+cmMKCtD4E/Q== =sB58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--