From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: disk-usage Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:39:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhqr5x81.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87imxgmacr.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874l8z7cmi.fsf@gmx.de> <874l8zr0cs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="53462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Pierre Neidhardt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 19 21:40:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gwCBe-000Dcv-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:40:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54735 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwCBc-0002sT-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:40:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwCBR-0002rB-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwCBO-0001jo-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:40345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwCBN-0001bq-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.47.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lrek1-1h1zzw3F3F-013Qgh; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:39:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874l8zr0cs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:26:27 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ZNOu0QFfH4ypVRdTBXPI3cOEb2z0L6RrhVY8iS25vaJ+egGk17z q+hgTFOJyaG2UhPbM+YOIpX2Hnz6GkvKKclGzz6ckl5vytMdqOhJAZeEZKxTBDGGCvPbJBN pp/hr7jIKSpJu/7dr+o6Zx0Qfl9JxfkspU/CzNefDIiIGqhgjhZpWtfn9axLbwfbqsT31WX 3gdMwd/m10uW5Ju2qsIXw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:lUR83nWjO4s=:SK7o0kFgcXWGzeYDqpxYP9 cFxIglgqI6V0thkPo6JquPo2GG3QuuQ9Vu4reahridIdHavb+piKXxMkGb9qP8Bdd2fRH3A9L P9dFRE7E4PYQJfb9KuhrZiG1hepd6BcHi7KdJ+LnrgQiQ2g/GqjiIrehh13fiqzdCDKW3+V8H LuzFG8Tby94ZIQIcybsgcYJddpn3FerDe4TsC9Xq9Ytup9Tg39BfSTg5AcdhazBFNwJkpkzPr hHPgqGohOnZiz9WA5EgRmQtsMtzt67lNY0HWYOszOBQxPJjUeXwQUeg+Mw8hip9uMOCUJhbKO bgITqVmrJrObuMRyghUsezO+0XsZLPmHGQKm6+BsqFo5dck6zeDCMpnyGiKXnUtFJ2+bEl2v4 lDVDoslvKuBRmlelzjM5BFI0t7UXHWRsuRoIIF9Tpj5SYl10SBLq+QNmAoafizGgpoIM0vtms Ka1H5ArwwQG65pWXWYkWcY/oehWYDvWntmQfquDyQKWuJ8BZ+SavbcJeJncmYjrreuTVqQlHa DiKB0VIugfj2BQ2iD+1ctOP2T5L8Vxr5D969idU3NPu/GODXQnR6haMWWBp25uJCsAaLtVXIJ 2AoiUsyIZIrmhsP/EIK8j5/Aa1v096/3W1fWoj6bycmxAHBXdGHWxljDdZXb1CZZMJX6z+mv8 EsBxY6aPv/J0FYatE1ovtWN8emGGhEymKgBRUUqMr38j2EM6vFFYILkOUtWibaeXwGjYQotzV 7vLCqJfaQfgkPO8Jg/uMnI85zutIPtJn8FF0VtxmInbCXtGYhC0gqU2/Vy+vXWyCAJyFlNei X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233471 Archived-At: Pierre Neidhardt writes: Hi Pierre, >> Is there a reason you apply `call-process' instead of `process-file'? >> With the latter, you could scan also directories on remote machines. > > Nope, will do, just forgot about it (bad habit). Thanks. And in case you want to support different command arguments per host, you might think about connection-local variables. >> One suggestion: you know for sure key bindings. Other people won't. >> Maybe you could add a menue for your *disk-usage<...>* buffers? > > Isn't `describe-mode' enough? Of course, and I did. But a menue is more convenient. 'C-h m' returns: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- key binding --- ------- TAB forward-button ESC Prefix Command SPC scroll-up-command - negative-argument 0 .. 9 digit-argument < beginning-of-buffer > end-of-buffer ? describe-mode R disk-usage-toggle-recursive S tabulated-list-sort ^ disk-usage-up d disk-usage-dired-at-point e disk-usage-eshell-at-point f disk-usage-toggle-full-path g revert-buffer h disk-usage-toggle-human-readable m disk-usage-mark n next-line p previous-line q quit-window u disk-usage-unmark x disk-usage-delete-marked-files DEL scroll-down-command S-SPC scroll-down-command disk-usage-find-file-at-point disk-usage-up backward-button mouse-face mouse-select-window (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) Prefix Command C-M-i backward-button --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- A longer list than needed; the relevant keys must be found. Ahh, and applying 'e' (disk-usage-eshell-at-point) returns --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- eshell-mode: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Cheers! Best regards, Michael.