From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35513: (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number)) seems not to work always. Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:45:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhipit7t.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87v9yv2mmm.fsf@gmail.com> <877e5tn5yq.fsf@gnus.org> <877e5tk7zf.fsf@gmail.com> <87impdhesp.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="252693"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35513@debbugs.gnu.org, Uwe Brauer To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 27 19:27:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDu2A-0013VV-C1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:27:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDu28-0002u2-RF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtNe-00031L-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtNc-0001Xb-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtNa-0001HC-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtNZ-0000to-IZ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87v9yv2mmm.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Uwe Brauer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 35513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35513.1569602721880 (code B ref 35513); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:45:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtMu-0000Dq-Vm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:37973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDtMs-00005p-VP for 35513@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id w12so3932919wro.5 for <35513@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:45:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=2a0y6cYU+D837lWVKv9fa3WW/h/1cIZuR6PFb2t02M4=; b=QQluWCYMQuS7SMYqs/ajAMkE1K6U3/nvgEmDZJsnJYjVsPIKg0d57T9R3lEVNfmc4s dekovtDrcwQ3vmcZu48/uMqyDPHdbes4kebG8/EizAwb4ezmKS1FTP5HlKAAYF+qMRtl sJiNpuyKx+85E2P9TnoRF7PQAeX+hkU4lYQi4+QAWPd3O2DVJsACrdZ+MxTfmFw6mqY8 xd7tCxmn3GrLuQlcX4wIrSIqI2t4qVOnV0tyA0TIrTWvD4LKHbxrRvH5xg+PebQWaDaZ 9boKR2YB0BQtGSGhjhDwcZJLXHv8QQVq8KqJoklnp6CI6mm56Jtf+sLW5aogfF42xCL3 KqhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2a0y6cYU+D837lWVKv9fa3WW/h/1cIZuR6PFb2t02M4=; b=V6L6tS7oARCilmc3rFn5YC/toDmzIo1yQ/fRgaeDjlQGz6q4goQX0gYCVhY2mQrrr6 ZIGnIhwHeIALnco+/vY2p3MZ4oEw2kNnNpgySvDBEpsckyKqt6zf71nBT3hc0ENu50WA IY+lzSwRgIQZBxVRBGP46NFnZLwT1bhgwEPn65FMuv2hrCIXr9xtK1wEHaRGfSpemKd0 GFg3ie7i+x4RJBaazwtb3m/tNiDUPTV0GkrszqtJW//eao8PtPfAFmyw3hmFvE0W8JMK rUJFDOu14EjrpHS719mAl7YTmqNOXjIazhFZ01c7JoMvS005jO+BOuvETKunA2f841sF OUUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9KnjMf8QR85O7LrYcDc86OXpMA4Hx9jAfwotxKzEGPANiNhD/ kQy2kEYzPBqR5CbFYmhfbTQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRVbWCODknBgdqQ/3tWnpxBHEQgVX8k03mjcS5UMpsLfVi4HBHdEhPhhCHrdZp39mtPDpFFA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:660c:: with SMTP id n12mr3915925wru.286.1569602713282; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Utnapischtim (bzq-79-182-2-145.red.bezeqint.net. [79.182.2.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm8605105wmi.13.2019.09.27.09.45.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:45:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: emacs 27.0.50 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:190927:larsi@gnus.org::WNSo2JAG+TmIYsfI:0000wtT X-Hashcash: 1:20:190927:oub.oub.oub@gmail.com::i4GhP/JyZsmS09Kr:00000000000000000000000000000000000000003UmD X-Hashcash: 1:20:190927:35513@debbugs.gnu.org::ZCTaqBytf01a0I6b:00000000000000000000000000000000000000004ZfE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167434 Archived-At: >>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> So you don't find it annoying and to difficult to implement and maybe >> to debug? > I think breaking threads on subject change is a misfeature, so enhancing > that misfeature doesn't seem appropriate. So you are saying that if I change the subject line in a tread, I should not break the thread? I came to this feature by a recommendation of John Wiley. If you change the subject, change the thread, for me that looks logically, you say, no?