From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add new functions to mark/unmark/delete all bookmarks Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:40:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87zh7nqkv1.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <20200724005105.11f85d5f@pineapple> <87pn8ku3y9.fsf@red-bean.com> <20200725124618.49a073b1@pineapple> <878sf7s55y.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10930"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Matthew White To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 26 00:41:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jzSqu-0002kz-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 00:41:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzSqt-0001pG-Va for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzSqP-0001Jt-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from newsp.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:56332 helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzSqN-0007Qq-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:40:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=L4XyeomdV8RZ4Gg7O64IzmivkfdQGi3sNMPgAch9fPg=; t=1595716838; x=1596926438; b=BjKTU1+T1JHMehyxsFskJgVTluJ4HI0SfxMorjiq4aap6ZFm+BPgwFVGJi7u9xrbOW/wv4qCTM PhsyCFzOcngaXALcF5Csr2moIj2CbZsKqygM2E3l6XCd+CC3guI4QKMPNfCiSOhtObdr/twT5TlvZ 5XQ1CyIZD7KMIdDIban84bZvxT2FUD944kYjGrrPvki7pKnrjopJptMsrNeIM3XhHV8jaPSNluabm +jlRSD58j078dJWJZd404NoJ/foJ3khsXYCuWS1fWIAddungpaxV2u5RM3X8PMkaFcJwlAnDZ0wVm 6j+dX9G0v7R+X9apD/8VmdZ7q7v5Zumo/Aiag==; Original-Received: from 99-112-125-163.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net ([99.112.125.163]:58186 helo=floss) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jzSqK-0007UL-3P; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 22:40:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:14:45 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/25 18:40:38 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253241 Archived-At: On 25 Jul 2020, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I'm actually not sure yet which branch we should apply on -- I think >> 'emacs-27' is the right answer, as per CONTRIBUTE, but if anyone knows >> better please say so. > >Definitely not `emacs-27` since that one is in hard-freeze until the >Emacs-27.1 release (i.e. only apply patches there which have been >explicitly allowed by the high command (i.e., Eli) because they fix >known bugs in an obviously safe way; with less stringent conditions when >the patch only changes the docs). Thanks, Stefan. I'll use 'master' then.